DFX Intelligence
Board records
What the boards decided, were recommended, and were askedHow board records are readRead from the boards’ own minutes and meeting packets, each row with the stance the minutes give it. Approved is a vote or a commitment reported as made under delegated authority; recommended is staff or the consultant asking, with no vote in the record; proposed is an item presented for consideration. Every row carries the sentence that says so.A re-up prospect is arithmetic on the tape: the allocator holds Fund N, the manager has Fund N+1 open, and no commitment to it is on the graph; it is labelled an inference and says nothing about intent.Same manager, same series and name stem, the next number (or a later vintage), open now on the venture or private equity graph, and no commitment to it on this graph. Dated at the successor’s first Form D sale when there is one. A row retires by itself when a commitment to the successor lands.
- Sep 16, 2026Re-up prospectreport dateinferenceMitchell Kapor Foundation holds REACH IV, LP; the manager is raising: Reach V, L.P. (fundraising, seen 2026-09-16); no commitment to it on the graphwith Reach Management, LLCno URL
- Apr 10, 2025Re-up prospectinferenceMitchell Kapor Foundation holds JANUARY VENTURES FUND II LP; the manager is raising: January Ventures Fund III, LP (fundraising, Form D first sale 2025-04-10); no commitment to it on the graphwith January Ventures GP, LLCno URL
- Aug 29, 2024Re-up prospectinferenceMitchell Kapor Foundation holds THE LEGALTECH FUND I LP; the manager is raising: LegalTech Fund II, L.P. (fundraising, Form D first sale 2024-08-29); no commitment to it on the graphwith The Legaltech Fund Management Co., L.L.C.no URL
- Apr 19, 2024Re-up prospectinferenceMitchell Kapor Foundation holds INFINITY VC FUND I LP; the manager has a newer fund open: Infinity VC Fund II, L.P. (early deployment, Form D first sale 2024-04-19); no commitment to it on the graphwith Infinity Investment Management Holdings, LLCno URL