DFX Intelligence
Board records
What the boards decided, were recommended, and were askedHow board records are readRead from the boards’ own minutes and meeting packets, each row with the stance the minutes give it. Approved is a vote or a commitment reported as made under delegated authority; recommended is staff or the consultant asking, with no vote in the record; proposed is an item presented for consideration. Every row carries the sentence that says so.A re-up prospect is arithmetic on the tape: the allocator holds Fund N, the manager has Fund N+1 open, and no commitment to it is on the graph; it is labelled an inference and says nothing about intent.Same manager, same series and name stem, the next number (or a later vintage), open now on the venture or private equity graph, and no commitment to it on this graph. Dated at the successor’s first Form D sale when there is one. A row retires by itself when a commitment to the successor lands.
- Sep 23, 2026Re-up prospectreport dateinferenceThe Eisner Foundation Inc holds ACCEL LEADERS 4 L.P.; the manager is raising: Accel Leaders 5 L.P. (fundraising, seen 2026-09-23); no commitment to it on the graphwith Accel Management Co. Inc.no URL
- Sep 16, 2026Re-up prospectreport dateinferenceThe Eisner Foundation Inc holds GREYCROFT GROWTH III, L.P.; the manager is raising: Greycroft Growth IV Holdings, L.P. (fundraising, seen 2026-09-16); no commitment to it on the graphwith Greycroft LPno URL
- Sep 16, 2026Re-up prospectreport dateinferenceThe Eisner Foundation Inc holds NEW ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATES 18, L.P.; the manager is raising: New Enterprise Associates 19, L.P. (fundraising, seen 2026-09-16); no commitment to it on the graphwith NEW Enterprise Associatesno URL
- Jan 30, 2026Re-up prospectinferenceThe Eisner Foundation Inc holds GREYCROFT PARTNERS VII, L.P.; the manager is raising: Greycroft Partners VIII, L.P. (fundraising, Form D first sale 2026-01-30); no commitment to it on the graphwith Greycroft LPno URL