Clayton
Hybrid manager, based in US.
Composed from this firm's filed classification and location. It has no published description on record.
- Investments held
- 1 of 1
- Deals, last 12 months
- 0
1 additional fund, deal or LP commitment
Every relationship, signal and contact on this record, with the source on each.
Includes 3 days of DFX Intelligence. Then $199/month unless canceled.
Nothing material in the last 180 days.
Capital path
who backs this record, through what, into what; each name opens its own path- Vinson & Elkins LLPlegal adviser, 1 shared
- Potter Anderson & Corroonlegal adviser, 1 shared
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPlegal adviser, 1 shared
Relationship network
4 connected entities1 observed dealdeals 2023
From announced deals and their parties, Form ADV and Form D filings, the firm's funds and team, and disclosed LP commitments in the private equity graph. Dollar figures appear only where a source disclosed one.
- Company
- Service provider
›How strength and recency are read
Strength is read from the deals: three or more is a strong observed relationship, two a repeat counterparty, one a single interaction. People and vehicles are structural. Nothing is scored that a reader cannot check.
Darker lines were active in the last 24 months or are current; lighter lines are older or undated.
Classification, Form ADV and stated criteria
Classification, Form ADV and stated criteria
How this organization is classified, and on what basisHybrid manager · 1 in historyShowHide
- Class
- Hybrid managerprobable, confidence 65%
- Basis
- Private Equity Funds are 0 of 1 distinct vehicles; hedge, securitized or liquidity vehicles 0
- Size band
- unsizeddefined by: no Private Equity Fund GAV on a filing from 2021 or later
Classification history (1)
- Sep 14, 2026Hybrid manager (probable, 65%)Private Equity Funds are 0 of 1 distinct vehicles; hedge, securitized or liquidity vehicles 0
Regulatory footprint (Form ADV)no Form ADV on recordShowHide
- Adviser type
- unknown
- Form ADV filings
- unknown
- RAUM
- unknownregulatory assets under management of the adviser; not dry powder, not a fund size
- PE funds, latest filing
- unknown
- PE fund GAV, latest filing
- unknownreported gross assets (Form ADV), not fund size
- All private fund GAV
- unknownevery private fund type, latest filing
- 2024 PE fund GAV
- unknownsum over funds typed Private Equity Fund with a 2024 or later as-of date
- PE share of funds, lifetime
- unknown
- Employees
- unknown
Stated criteria beside observed behaviourno criteria stated · 1 observed dealsShowHide
- Sectors
- not stated or not yet read
- Geography
- not stated or not yet read
- Revenue
- not stated or not yet read
- EBITDA
- not stated or not yet read
- Enterprise value
- not stated or not yet read
- Equity check
- not stated or not yet read
- Control
- not stated or not yet read
- Thesis
- not stated or not yet read
- On record
- 1 company, 1 holding, 1 transaction
- Period
- 2023 (2 dated observations)
- Deal roles
- 1 platform
- Control
- 1 control
- By year
- 2023: 1 platform
1 company on the graph (1 transaction); 1 platform and 0 add-ons; observed 2023 to 2023
Funds
How vehicles are groupedFeeders, parallels, executive funds, alternative investment vehicles and lettered sleeves are folded under the fund they belong to, read from the vehicle names. Deal-by-deal co-investment vehicles are pooled. Current funds come first: families are ordered by vintage, newest first, among those holding at least a twentieth of the largest family’s assets, then by size. The figure is the sum of each vehicle’s latest reported gross assets on Form ADV, not a fund size.Team
Where the team comes fromEach row names its source in short; hover the source for its full description. A person named by two sources under two spellings is shown once, with both sources.Deals
How deals are mergedOne row per deal. A portfolio relationship and a transaction that describe the same deal (the same transaction, or the same company on the same date) are printed once, with the columns of both. 1 portfolio relationships and 1 transaction are on this record.| Date | Company | Deal | This firm’s role | Status | Partner | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2023 | Focus Financial Partners | Platform acquisition | Sponsor (confirmed) | active held 3.6 years | unknown | stonepoint.com |
Portfolio credit
Where these figures come fromPortfolio companies matched to a BDC borrower by an identity-graded bridge, read from each BDC’s own schedule of investments: the lenders’ marks, their accrual footnotes, PIK and maturities. Observed, never forecast. Firms whose own BDC lends to the company are left out.- Principal held
- $181M
- 13 lenders
- Weighted mark
- 97.8
- +1 pt on the quarter, same 1
- Non-accrual now
- 0
- 0 placed at Jun 30, 2026
- Marked down
- 0
- 2 pts or more on the quarter
- Maturing in 12 months
- 0
- none stated
- 1 portfolio company on a BDC schedule at Jun 30, 2026: 1 with ownership stated current, 0 listed on a portfolio page with no date or status.
- Lenders mark them at 97.8 on cost, weighted by principal (1 borrower with a mark inside the plausible band).
- On the 1 borrower marked at both Mar 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026, the weighted mark moved +1 point; 0 fell 2 points or more and 0 rose 2 points or more.
Show the credit outlook: 1 borrowers, 13 lenders, 8 quartersas of Jun 30, 2026
1 borrower is in every figure above and named with Private Credit Intelligence.
13 lenders are counted here and named with Private Credit Intelligence.
| Quarter end | Held | Principal | Mark | Non-accrual placed | PIK added or up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2024 | 1 | $96.6M | 100.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | 1 | $140M | 101.2 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 31, 2025 | 1 | $160M | 99.3 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 30, 2025 | 1 | $237M | 100.3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 30, 2025 | 1 | $292M | 100.4 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 1 | $288M | 100.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | 1 | $183M | 97.2 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | 1 | $181M | 97.9 | 0 | 0 |
A look back at today’s portfolio companies, not a record of what the sponsor owned then. Mark is fair value over cost across every position inside the plausible band.
- A mark is the lender's own fair value over cost for the quarter. Below 90 means the lender carries the loan at a discount of 10 or more on the dollar; it is that lender's valuation, not DFX's.
- Two lenders on the same facility 10 points apart are valuing the same loan differently; which one is right is not something a schedule of investments says.
- Non-accrual is read from the BDC's own footnote, never inferred from a mark. PIK is interest the borrower pays in more debt rather than cash.
- No forecast is made here. DFX does not publish a default or distress prediction for a sponsor.
Population: portfolio companies matched to a BDC borrower by an identity-graded bridge, on a BDC schedule of investments at Jun 30, 2026, ownership not recorded as exited. Firms whose own BDC lends to the company, and private credit managers, are left out: that is lending, not ownership. Marks, principal and accrual status are the BDCs' own filed figures; the quarter before is Mar 31, 2026.
Placement agents, lenders, advisers and co-investors
- Vinson & Elkins LLP 1 shared · one time · last Feb 27, 2023
- Potter Anderson & Corroon 1 shared · one time · last Feb 27, 2023
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 1 shared · one time · last Feb 27, 2023
LP commitments
How LPs are totalledOne line per LP, largest disclosed total first. A commitment that the same LP reports again in a later document is counted once in its total; both documents stay in the full list. Rows repeated line for line from one document are shown once.Events
Every recent event on record repeats an LP commitment or a deal listed above.
Clayton is the same institution as 1 record in Private Credit.
The joined record opens with the product, beside every other relationship on this page.
Checking your plan…
Record history
- Platform investment2023-02-27source on record
- Platform investment2023-02-27source on record
The ledger records every merge, rename and reclassification this record went through and the dated filings observed on it, so the identity on this page can be traced to the records it was built from. The ledger's own sentences name other records, so they show with the names.