DFX Intelligence
Board records
What the boards decided, were recommended, and were askedHow board records are readRead from the boards’ own minutes and meeting packets, each row with the stance the minutes give it. Approved is a vote or a commitment reported as made under delegated authority; recommended is staff or the consultant asking, with no vote in the record; proposed is an item presented for consideration. Every row carries the sentence that says so.A re-up prospect is arithmetic on the tape: the allocator holds Fund N, the manager has Fund N+1 open, and no commitment to it is on the graph; it is labelled an inference and says nothing about intent.Same manager, same series and name stem, the next number (or a later vintage), open now on the venture or private equity graph, and no commitment to it on this graph. Dated at the successor’s first Form D sale when there is one. A row retires by itself when a commitment to the successor lands.
- Sep 22, 2026Re-up prospectreport dateinferenceInasmuch Foundation holds LUX VENTURES VIII; the manager is raising: Lux Ventures IX, L.P. (fundraising, seen 2026-09-22); no commitment to it on the graphwith LUX Capital Management, LLCno URL
- Sep 16, 2026Re-up prospectreport dateinferenceInasmuch Foundation holds FRANCISCO PARTNERS VII; the manager is raising: Francisco Partners VIII, L.P. (fundraising, seen 2026-09-16); no commitment to it on the graphwith Francisco Partnersno URL
- Sep 16, 2026Re-up prospectreport dateinferenceInasmuch Foundation holds PEAR VENTURES IV; the manager is raising: Pear Ventures V, L.P. (fundraising, seen 2026-09-16); no commitment to it on the graphwith Pear Ventures Management, LLCno URL
- Nov 3, 2025Re-up prospectinferenceInasmuch Foundation holds RECURRING CAPITAL FUND II; the manager has a newer fund open: Recurring Capital Fund V, L.P. (state not recorded, Form D first sale 2025-11-03); no commitment to it on the graph; 2 fund(s) of the series between them not held eitherwith Recurring Capital Management Company, LLCno URL