DFX Intelligence
Data Factory
Reading the graph
Reading the graph
| Class | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tano Capital, LLC Firm · Private equity · matched Tano Singapore Advisors Pte. Ltd. (relying Adviser) | · probable Lower middle market | San Mateo, | $166M | 2 | 1 | |||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| $37.4M | 5 | 2016 | ||||||
Costanoa Ventures Firm · Venture · matched Costanoa Venture Capital Management, LLC · Exempt reporting adviser Also on RIA / Wealth Management | Palo Alto, | $2.0B | 9 | 16 | 18 | 2025 | ||
| 2001 | ||||||||
| 2013 | ||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||
| $68.7M | 21 | 2012 | ||||||
| NEW YORK, | $7.9B | 3 | 2014 | |||||
Cayetano Development, LLC Manager · RE funds · Under 1b Also on RIA / Wealth Management, Venture Capital | Austin, | $527M | 61 | 5 | 2024 | |||
Lower middle market | Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy Of Luxembourg, | $638M | 59 | 5 | 36 | |||
| 2012 | ||||||||
| 2012 | ||||||||
Tano India Private Equity Fund I Fund · Private equity · Tano Capital, LLC Also on RIA / Wealth Management | $89.1M | |||||||
| · probable Unsized | Dallas, | $250M | 2 | 4 | ||||
| $20.2M | 13 | 2021 | ||||||
| $139M | 1 | 2024 | ||||||
| $363M | 2024 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | $325M | 2025 | ||||||
| $312M | 2024 | |||||||
Electric Power Brd of Chattanooga Retirement Plan Allocator · Allocators · matched ELECTRIC POWER BRD OF CHATTANOOGA RET PLAN · <100M | $66.9M | 2024 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority Pension Plan and Trust (CLOSED 2009) Allocator · Allocators · matched CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON CO HOSPITAL AUTHORITY PENSION PLAN & TRUST (CLOSED 2009) · <100M | $71.4M | 2024 | ||||||
| LA MESA, | 2026 | |||||||
| South Plainfield, | 436 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 229 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 180 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 168 | |||||||
| Antioch, | 103 | |||||||
| San Juan, | 125 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 111 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 106 | |||||||
| Lexington, | 105 | |||||||
| Itasca, | 99 | |||||||
| Bethlehem, | 98 | |||||||
| Bridgewater, | 93 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 53 | |||||||
| Terryville, | 72 | |||||||
| Nashua, | 54 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 66 | |||||||
| Pittsburgh, | 58 | |||||||
| Petaluma, | 52 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 51 | |||||||
| Pinehurst, | 2 | |||||||
| Aberdeen, | 1 | |||||||
| Nashville, | 1 | |||||||
| Chattanooga, | 1 | |||||||
| Dallas, | 1 |
Ranked by what the graph knows (size, observed deals, people, funds) unless you sort. Size is the best-evidenced figure for the row: AUM or regulatory AUM for firms and offices, close or reported gross asset value for funds, disclosed raised for companies. Click a class or a state in the table to filter by it. Counts are records per graph; with no graph selected, a firm that is on several graphs (matched by CRD, CIK, EIN or fund id, never by name) is listed once, with a dot for each graph.