DFX Intelligence
Allocator Intelligence
The capital-owner graph behind private markets. Who owns the capital, who decides, how much, under what policy, on whose advice, to which managers, and what changed, with a source and a date behind every row. A target is never an actual, a disclosed holding is never an approval, and an estimate says so.
Taft-Hartley plan
Local 108 Retirement Plan
Taft-Hartley planMaplewood, NJ
Assets
$28.6M
Total assets, Dec 31, 2024 reported
Funded
86.9%
Aug 1, 2022
Private markets target
n/a
policy Dec 31, 2024
Commitments
0
none on the tape
Plan sponsor: Board of Trustees Local 108 Retirement Plan
Allocation policy
Form 5500, as of Dec 31, 2024
Actual allocation lines without a target (as filed)
- Interest-bearing cash 2.5%
- Non-interest-bearing cash 0.0%
- Corporate debt instruments (other) 1.3%
- U.S. Government securities 30.4%
- Registered investment companies 16.6%
- Common stock 48.9%
Consultants and advisers
4 firms
- Stacey Braun Associates, Inc. Investment adviser (plan)through Jul 31, 2023 Form 5500
- SDP Professional Services, LLC Trusteethrough Dec 31, 2024 Form 5500
- Principal Spectrum Asset Management Custodianthrough Jul 31, 2023 Form 5500
- Milliman, Inc. Actuarythrough Jul 31, 2023 Form 5500
People
No investment staff or executives have been read for this allocator yet.
Manager roster
3 managers on Schedule C
From Schedule C (investment management, code 28)
- MD Sass Associates, Incplan years 2023
- MD Sassplan years 2023
- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLCplan years 2023
Commitments
No fund commitments are on the tape for this allocator. The tape holds the plans that publish their own private-markets reports; a plan that publishes one and is not here is a gap we can close.
Size and funding
23 readings
Plan assets
Funded ratio
Investment management fees
$54,951 (2023-12) · $156,845 (2023-07)
Form 5500 filings
3 plan years
| Plan year | Participants | Assets (SB market) | Funding target | FTAP | Total assets (H) | Partnerships / JV | Master trust | Real estate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 | 1,068 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $28.6M | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 2023 to Dec 31, 2023 | 1,071 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $28.7M | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 2022 to Jul 31, 2023 | 1,118 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $28.0M | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Service providers and investment entities as filed (Schedule C and D, latest year first)
- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney codes 28 51 $94,270 PY2024
- Rwdsu Local 108 codes 12 14 $59,995 PY2024
- Milliman Inc. codes 11 50 $56,321 PY2024
- Cary Kane LLP codes 29 50 $30,740 PY2024
- Stacey Braun Associates, Inc. codes 27 50 $30,000 PY2024
- Principal Custody Solutions codes 19 50 $20,780 PY2024
- Novak Francella, LLC codes 10 50 $18,000 PY2024
- MD Sass Associates, Inc codes 28 51 68 $16,240 PY2024
- SDP Professional Services, LLC codes 21 50 $9,000 PY2024
- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney codes 28 51 $30,756 PY2023
- Cary Kane LLP codes 29 50 $27,750 PY2023
- Rwdsu Local 108 codes 12 14 $26,040 PY2023
- Milliman Inc. codes 11 50 $20,616 PY2023
- Novak Francella, LLC codes 10 50 $18,000 PY2023
- Stacey Braun Associates, Inc. codes 27 50 $15,666 PY2023
- Principal Custody Solutions codes 19 50 $9,161 PY2023
- MD Sass Associates, Inc codes 28 51 68 $8,531 PY2023
- Milliman Inc. codes 11 50 $92,704 PY2022
- Rwdsu Local 108 codes 12 14 $90,780 PY2022
- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney codes 28 51 $85,849 PY2022
- Stacey Braun Associates, Inc. codes 27 50 $31,664 PY2022
- Cary Kane LLP codes 29 50 $25,800 PY2022
- Principal Custody Solutions codes 19 50 $21,313 PY2022
- MD Sass Associates, Inc codes 28 51 68 $18,019 PY2022
- Novak Francella, LLC codes 10 50 $18,000 PY2022
- Milliman codes 11 PY2022
What changed
No dated events yet.
Board record: approvals, recommendations, searches, terminations and re-up prospects for this system.
Provenance
Identifiers: EIN-PN 226176321-001
Cross-graph: no entry on another DFX graph
First observed Sep 15, 2026, last observed Sep 15, 2026. Classification confirmed. Every row above carries its source; a reported figure is the subject’s own, a derived one is arithmetic on reported figures, an estimated one is a model or a survey imputation and is never summed into a headline.