DFX Intelligence
Allocator Intelligence
The capital-owner graph behind private markets. Who owns the capital, who decides, how much, under what policy, on whose advice, to which managers, and what changed, with a source and a date behind every row. A target is never an actual, a disclosed holding is never an approval, and an estimate says so.
The names on this page are hidden. Create a free account and they fill in. No card, and every figure, date and source on this page is public either way.
Taft-Hartley plan
I••••••••• L•••• 3• P•••••• P•••
Taft-Hartley planPittsburgh, PA
Assets
$12.5M
Total assets, Dec 31, 2024 reported
Funded
72.9%
Jan 1, 2024
Private markets target
n/a
policy Dec 31, 2024
Commitments
0
1 managers on Schedule C
Plan sponsor: I••••••••• L•••• 3• P•••••• P•••
Allocation policy
Form 5500, as of Dec 31, 2024
Actual allocation lines without a target (as filed)
- Interest-bearing cash 1.7%
- Non-interest-bearing cash 0.9%
- Registered investment companies 96.5%
Consultants and advisers
2 firms
- X••••• Investment adviser (plan)through Dec 31, 2022 Form 5500
- C••••• A••••••••• Actuarythrough Dec 31, 2022 Form 5500
People
No investment staff or executives have been read for this allocator yet.
Manager roster
2 managers on Schedule C
From Schedule C (investment management, code 28)
- C••••• P••••••• L••plan years 2024
- X•••••plan years 2023
Commitments
No fund commitments are on the tape for this allocator. The tape holds the plans that publish their own private-markets reports; a plan that publishes one and is not here is a gap we can close.
Size and funding
30 readings
Investment management fees
$45,446 (2023-12) · $45,826 (2022-12)
Form 5500 filings
3 plan years
| Plan year | Participants | Assets (SB market) | Funding target | FTAP | Total assets (H) | Partnerships / JV | Master trust | Real estate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 to Dec 31, 2024 | 179 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $12.5M | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 2023 to Dec 31, 2023 | 185 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $11.6M | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 2022 to Dec 31, 2022 | 151 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $9.9M | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Service providers and investment entities as filed (Schedule C and D, latest year first)
- CW Breitsman Associates LLC codes 13 $52,685 PY2024
- X••••• codes 28 $34,976 PY2024
- C••••• A••••••••• codes 11 $23,021 PY2024
- Meyer Unkovic & Scott LLP codes 29 $14,871 PY2024
- C••••• Partners codes 28 $11,774 PY2024
- Cypher & Cypher Cpa's codes 10 $6,800 PY2024
- C••••• A•••••••••, Inc codes 11 PY2024
- CW Breitsman Associates LLC codes 13 $52,152 PY2023
- X••••• codes 28 $45,446 PY2023
- C••••• A••••••••• codes 11 $30,105 PY2023
- Meyer Unkovic & Scott LLP codes 29 $12,512 PY2023
- Cypher & Cypher Cpa's codes 10 $6,900 PY2023
- C••••• A•••••••••, Inc codes 11 PY2023
- CW Breitsman Associates LLC codes 13 $52,152 PY2022
- X••••• codes 27 $45,826 PY2022
- C••••• A••••••••• codes 11 $29,954 PY2022
- Meyer Unkovic & Scott LLP codes 29 $8,893 PY2022
- Cypher & Cypher Cpa's codes 10 $5,800 PY2022
- C••••• A•••••••••, Inc codes 11 PY2022
What changed
5 events
- Dec 31, 2024Manager relationship startedC••••• Partners appears on I••••••••• L•••• 3• P•••••• P•••'s Schedule C as investment manager (plan year 2024 vs 2023)with C••••• P••••••• L••askebsa.dol.gov
- Jan 1, 2024Assets changedI••••••••• L•••• 3• P•••••• P••• plan assets $10M -> $12M (+17.6%, 2023-01-01 to 2024-01-01)
- Dec 31, 2023Assets changedI••••••••• L•••• 3• P•••••• P••• total assets $10M -> $12M (+17.6%, 2022-12-31 to 2023-12-31)
- Jan 1, 2023Funded status changedI••••••••• L•••• 3• P•••••• P••• funded ratio 70.0% -> 72.0% (2022-01-01 to 2023-01-01)
- Jan 1, 2023Assets changedI••••••••• L•••• 3• P•••••• P••• plan assets $11M -> $10M (-10.8%, 2022-01-01 to 2023-01-01)
Board record: approvals, recommendations, searches, terminations and re-up prospects for this system.
Provenance
Identifiers: EIN-PN 256073053-001
Cross-graph: no entry on another DFX graph
First observed Sep 15, 2026, last observed Sep 15, 2026. Classification confirmed. Every row above carries its source; a reported figure is the subject’s own, a derived one is arithmetic on reported figures, an estimated one is a model or a survey imputation and is never summed into a headline.