DFX Intelligence
Data Factory
Reading the graph
Reading the graph
| Class | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | ||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| · candidate | Lisbon, Lisbon, | $1.5B | 3 | 1 | 2024 | |||
| Baltimore, | $123M | 45 | 18 | 16 | 2024 | |||
| Orange, | $419M | 14 | 2024 | |||||
| · candidate Lower middle market | Houston, | $1.6B | 7 | 5 | 22 | 2024 | ||
Kildare Partners US, LLC Manager · RE funds · matched Kildare Partners Uk, LLP (relying Adviser) · 1b 5b Also on RIA / Wealth Management | · candidate | Westlake, | $1.9B | 6 | 4 | 2024 | ||
Lower middle market | Winston-Salem, | $1.2B | 82 | 13 | 24 | 2024 | ||
| NEW YORK, | $206M | 2012 | ||||||
| · probable | $32.6M | 3 | 1 | 2026 | ||||
| San Francisco, | $27.3M | 2 | ||||||
| BOCA RATON, | $27.8M | 1 | 2012 | |||||
Nelda C. and H.J. Lutcher Stark Fndtn Plan Plan · Allocators · Nelda C. and H J Lutcher Stark Foundation | Orange, | $19.4M | 42 | 17 | 1 | 2024 | ||
ALDABRA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Registered adviser · RIA / Wealth · matched ALDABRA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $2.1M | 2026 | ||||||
| $2.2M | 2022 | |||||||
Laureldale Bor Non-Unif Employees Pension Plan Allocator · Allocators · matched LAURELDALE BOR NON-UNIF EMP PENSION PLAN · <100M | $1.6M | 2024 | ||||||
| $1.3M | 2022 | |||||||
| San Francisco, | ||||||||
| $660,270 | 2022 | |||||||
| PORTLAND, | 2014 | |||||||
| $517,152 | 2023 | |||||||
| ALBANY, | 2025 | |||||||
| 2026 | ||||||||
| 2026 | ||||||||
| HOUSTON, | $25.6M | 2026 | ||||||
| Eden, | 3,970 | |||||||
| Anaheim, | 2,257 | |||||||
| $1.7M | 2024 | |||||||
| Brooklyn, | 1,080 | |||||||
| Tinley Park, | 381 | |||||||
| Charleston, | 432 | |||||||
| Austin, | 431 | |||||||
| Ontario, | 415 | |||||||
| Waukesha, | 237 | |||||||
| Fairless Hills, | 207 | |||||||
| Belmont, | 183 | |||||||
| Penndel, | 173 | |||||||
| Quincy, | 157 | |||||||
| Needham, | 117 | |||||||
| New Haven, | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| Warren, | 107 | |||||||
| Sammamish, | 84 | |||||||
| Plymouth, | 70 | |||||||
| Campbell, | 63 | |||||||
| South San Francisco, | 59 | |||||||
| Catano, | 64 | |||||||
| Nitro, | 60 | |||||||
| San Francisco, | 3 | |||||||
| Oshkosh, | 56 | |||||||
| Lake Charles, | 53 |
Ranked by what the graph knows (size, observed deals, people, funds) unless you sort. Size is the best-evidenced figure for the row: AUM or regulatory AUM for firms and offices, close or reported gross asset value for funds, disclosed raised for companies. Click a class or a state in the table to filter by it. Counts are records per graph; with no graph selected, a firm that is on several graphs (matched by CRD, CIK, EIN or fund id, never by name) is listed once, with a dot for each graph.