Which companies just had a verified incident, who lends to them and who owns them. Every claim carries its evidence level and its source. How we decide what is confirmed
US Critical Infrastructure Cyber Intelligence
Early warning, active monitoring, verified incidents and infrastructure dependencies. Provider status posts are shown as what the provider published; only analyst-reviewed findings are called cyber incidents.
Coverage is reduced: DFX is not reading 105 of 124 status feeds, because their robots.txt does not allow it or could not be read, while we move to the incident feeds providers publish.
Filtered to all sectors, MI. Clear filters
Where the findings are
Shaded by the number of public findings in each state. A filled marker means the finding documents a site in that state; a ring means it is placed by headquarters only, which says nothing about the area around it. Select a state to filter the page.
Confirmed cyber incidents
Incidents confirmed by the organisation, a regulator or compelling corroborated evidence, reviewed by an analyst. Live provider posts never enter this list on their own.
No confirmed cyber incidents with activity in the last 7 days within monitored coverage.
Emerging operational signals
What providers published on their own status pages in this window, with the kind of wording they used. A disruption, a restriction or even security language is a provider statement, not a DFX finding that an attack occurred.
No provider status incidents with impact in the last 7 days.
50 provider status incidents are open right now across monitored providers.
Unexplained disruptions
Verifiable operational disruptions with no established cause. Listed factually, without any claim of compromise.
None published in this window.
National timeline
Research findings and significant provider posts in date order. Event, first public observation and acknowledgement dates are kept separate on each record's page.
No dated developments in this window.
Critical infrastructure sectors
Dependencies and downstream exposure
Documented relationships between providers and the organisations that rely on them, from vendor case studies, customer releases, regulator orders and breach notices. A relationship is not an impact: each dependent says whether impact is confirmed.
- Kempner WSC TXNo confirmed impact
- Culleoka WSC TXNo confirmed impact
- McCoy WSC TXNo confirmed impact
- Penrose WD CONo confirmed impact
- Pleasant Valley MWC CANo confirmed impact
- Village of Hopedale ILNo confirmed impact
- Broadway Bank (San Antonio)No confirmed impact
- Webster BankNo confirmed impact
- Capital Credit Union (WI)No confirmed impact
- Signature Bank of Georgia (ABA release May 2025, reported)No confirmed impact
- CrossState CU Association membersNo confirmed impact
- America First CUNo confirmed impact
- Greater Nevada CUNo confirmed impact
- America's Credit UnionNo confirmed impact
- Los Rios CCDNo confirmed impact
- Santa Monica CollegeNo confirmed impact
- about 60 California community college districtsNo confirmed impact
- Joe Wheeler EMCNo confirmed impact
- Huntsville UtilitiesNo confirmed impact
- Decatur UtilitiesNo confirmed impact
- Georgia PowerNo confirmed impact
- Alabama PowerNo confirmed impact
- Mississippi PowerNo confirmed impact
- U.S. State Department Foggy Bottom facilitiesNo confirmed impact
- George Washington UniversityNo confirmed impact
- DC traffic signalsNo confirmed impact
- All GitBook customers (API tokens invalidated, secrets rotation...No confirmed impact
- one unnamed targeted customerNo confirmed impact
- possibly Trade.xyzImpact reported publicly