DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
4,728 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPAL ADVISORS independent RIA | $174M | 5 | $34.8M | 94% | 78% | 37 | 1 | 1 | |
| JMS CAPITAL GROUP WEALTH SERVICES, LLC independent RIA | $174M | +7.9% | 3 | $58.0M | 77% | 64% | 138 | 1 | |
| FMA WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC independent RIA | $174M | +11% | 1 | $174M | 98% | 77% | 144 | 1 | |
| H•••••••• M••••••••• S••••••• I•• independent RIA | $174M | +30% | 3 | $58.0M | 59% | 60% | 72 | 1 | |
| A••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $174M | +24% | 1 | $174M | 98% | 73% | 144 | 5 | |
| J••••• W••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $174M | +1.9% | 3 | $57.9M | 95% | 89% | 46 | 1 | |
| A••••• P•••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $174M | -6.8% | 1 | $174M | 100% | 87% | 171 | 1 | |
| B•••••••• C•••••• G•••• L••• independent RIA | $174M | +18% | 3 | $57.9M | 100% | 78% | 55 | 3 | |
| D••••••• I••••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $174M | +5.2% | 2 | $86.8M | 94% | 82% | 71 | 1 | |
| P••••••• W••••• C•••••• I••• independent RIA | $174M | +31% | 2 | $86.8M | 98% | 88% | 50 | 2 | |
| N••••••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $174M | +16% | 3 | $57.8M | 100% | 54% | 65 | 1 | |
| P••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $173M | +8.1% | 1 | $173M | 100% | 88% | 125 | 1 | |
| L•••••• F•••••••• S••••••• I••• independent RIA | $173M | +11% | 5 | $34.6M | 100% | 71% | 54 | 1 | |
| W•••••• P••••• A•••••••• L••••• independent RIA | $173M | -1.8% | 1 | $173M | 86% | 85% | 208 | 1 | |
| I••••••••• A•••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $173M | +63% | 5 | $34.6M | 99% | 62% | 38 | 1 | |
| A•••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $173M | +23% | 1 | $173M | 100% | 89% | 102 | 1 | |
| S••••••••• • C•••••• independent RIA | $173M | +16% | 2 | $86.5M | 94% | 77% | 99 | 1 | |
| Z•••••• R••••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $173M | +21% | 5 | $34.6M | 100% | 63% | 34 | 1 | |
| S••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L••••• independent RIA | $173M | +15% | 2 | $86.5M | 99% | 79% | 72 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $173M | +24% | 3 | $57.6M | 98% | 78% | 45 | 1 | |
| R•••••••• P•••••• W••••• independent RIA | $173M | +6.4% | 4 | $43.2M | 100% | 78% | 46 | 3 | |
| L•••••• A•••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $173M | +21% | 2 | $86.4M | 100% | 51% | 122 | 1 | |
| Y•••• • A••••••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $173M | +7.9% | 2 | $86.3M | 99% | 84% | 54 | 1 | |
| W••••••••• I••••••••• independent RIA | $173M | +41% | 4 | $43.2M | 89% | 72% | 67 | 2 | 2 |
| W••••• M••••••••• S•••••••• independent RIA | $173M | +11% | 1 | $173M | 94% | 88% | 99 | 1 | |
| C•••• V••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $173M | +11% | 3 | $57.5M | 87% | 58% | 31 | 1 | |
| W•••• S••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $172M | +24% | 5 | $34.5M | 96% | 78% | 38 | 1 | |
| C••• F•••••••• D••••••• I••• independent RIA | $172M | +21% | 1 | $172M | 100% | 64% | 195 | 1 | |
| D••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $172M | +17% | 3 | $57.5M | 99% | 73% | 76 | 1 | |
| P••••••••• R•••• L•• independent RIA | $172M | +9.8% | 2 | $86.2M | 73% | 87% | 32 | 1 | |
| L••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $172M | +14% | 3 | $57.4M | 96% | 66% | 40 | 1 | |
| N•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $172M | +30% | 1 | $172M | 63% | 68% | 147 | 2 | |
| I••••••• A••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $172M | +13% | 4 | $43.0M | 99% | 77% | 46 | 2 | |
| M•••••••• F••••••• • F•••• I••••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $172M | +16% | 1 | $172M | 84% | 90% | 69 | 1 | |
| F•••••••• S•••••••• A••••••••• independent RIA | $172M | +10% | 2 | $85.9M | 100% | 76% | 135 | 1 | |
| O••••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $172M | +24% | 2 | $85.9M | 100% | 71% | 86 | 3 | |
| E••••••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $172M | +55% | 2 | $85.8M | 92% | 89% | 37 | 1 | |
| C••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• • C••••••••• independent RIA | $172M | +3.8% | 1 | $172M | 100% | 79% | 140 | 1 | |
| C••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $172M | 2 | $85.8M | 100% | 70% | 41 | 1 | ||
| K••••••••• • C•• independent RIA | $171M | +11% | 3 | $57.1M | 100% | 90% | 30 | 1 | |
| T•• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | -4.2% | 1 | $171M | 100% | 86% | 89 | 1 | |
| R••• C•••• A••••••• • C•••••• independent RIA | $171M | +24% | 3 | $57.1M | 100% | 80% | 53 | 2 | |
| I••••••••• W••••• S••••••••• independent RIA | $171M | +23% | 3 | $57.1M | 94% | 71% | 54 | 2 | |
| E••••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | +33% | 2 | $85.6M | 95% | 65% | 151 | 1 | |
| D••••• W• N•••••••• • A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | -0.1% | 3 | $57.1M | 99% | 75% | 52 | 1 | |
| H•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | +37% | 2 | $85.6M | 100% | 84% | 51 | 1 | |
| P•• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | +11% | 3 | $57.0M | 100% | 81% | 56 | 2 | |
| Y•••••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | +11% | 1 | $171M | 72% | 71% | 115 | 2 | |
| C••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | -25% | 4 | $42.7M | 71% | 78% | 91 | 1 | |
| T••••••• B••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $171M | +48% | 3 | $56.9M | 100% | 89% | 34 | 3 | |
| P•••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $171M | +13% | 2 | $85.3M | 81% | 60% | 131 | 1 | |
| P••••••••• F•••••••• G••••• L••••• independent RIA | $170M | +17% | 4 | $42.6M | 88% | 63% | 90 | 1 | |
| R•••••• P••• A••••••• independent RIA | $170M | +19% | 2 | $85.2M | 100% | 87% | 61 | 1 | |
| Z••• C•••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $170M | +18% | 1 | $170M | 79% | 76% | 73 | 1 | |
| G• D•••••• M••••••• independent RIA | $170M | +12% | 3 | $56.7M | 95% | 53% | 133 | 1 | |
| T••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $170M | +15% | 3 | $56.6M | 99% | 75% | 57 | 1 | |
| K••• C•••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $170M | +35% | 5 | $34.0M | 85% | 84% | 53 | 2 | 4 |
| T•••••••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $170M | +11% | 1 | $170M | 76% | 86% | 113 | 1 | |
| E••••••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $170M | +6.2% | 2 | $84.9M | 80% | 68% | 80 | 2 | |
| S•••••••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $170M | +14% | 2 | $84.8M | 78% | 83% | 55 | 2 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.