DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
4,728 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEALTH QUARTERBACK LLC independent RIA | $391M | +18% | 5 | $78.3M | 99% | 57% | 222 | 15 | |
| EQUITA FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC. independent RIA | $391M | -5.2% | 17 | $23.0M | 100% | 77% | 26 | 19 | |
| POST OAK PRIVATE WEALTH ADVISORS independent RIA | $391M | +39% | 7 | $55.8M | 98% | 83% | 54 | 2 | |
| P•••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $391M | +14% | 3 | $130M | 93% | 88% | 66 | 1 | |
| H••••• D••••••• • A••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $391M | +8.9% | 4 | $97.6M | 92% | 88% | 59 | 1 | |
| I••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $390M | +10.0% | 11 | $35.5M | 99% | 67% | 131 | 7 | |
| P•••••• M•• I••••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $390M | +21% | 3 | $130M | 96% | 83% | 81 | 1 | |
| L••••• F•••••••• A••••••• I•• independent RIA | $390M | +16% | 3 | $130M | 97% | 87% | 72 | 1 | |
| J•• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $390M | +12% | 1 | $390M | 97% | 80% | 67 | 1 | |
| G•••• R•••• W••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $390M | +29% | 5 | $77.9M | 95% | 83% | 57 | 1 | |
| A••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $389M | +9.2% | 9 | $43.2M | 96% | 87% | 21 | 2 | |
| R•••••• F•••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $389M | +83% | 4 | $97.2M | 100% | 52% | 155 | 2 | |
| R•• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $389M | +20% | 12 | $32.4M | 53% | 59% | 66 | 5 | |
| R••• F•••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $389M | +12% | 4 | $97.2M | 96% | 78% | 86 | 1 | |
| C••••••• A•••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $389M | +12% | 2 | $194M | 89% | 74% | 178 | 1 | |
| P••••••• A••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $388M | +41% | 5 | $77.7M | 100% | 82% | 37 | 1 | |
| W••••••••• A••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $388M | +43% | 12 | $32.3M | 100% | 56% | 46 | 3 | |
| J••••• P• L•••• • A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $388M | +28% | 3 | $129M | 100% | 63% | 221 | 1 | |
| R••••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $388M | +23% | 6 | $64.6M | 92% | 89% | 47 | 1 | |
| H•••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $387M | +11% | 5 | $77.5M | 100% | 76% | 83 | 3 | |
| S•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $387M | -5.1% | 6 | $64.5M | 100% | 89% | 32 | 2 | |
| M•••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $387M | +30% | 4 | $96.8M | 64% | 72% | 56 | 3 | |
| L•••• A•••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $387M | +81% | 5 | $77.4M | 99% | 90% | 55 | 2 | |
| S•••••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $387M | +19% | 4 | $96.7M | 98% | 57% | 287 | 1 | |
| N•• W••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $387M | +23% | 6 | $64.5M | 99% | 72% | 83 | 2 | |
| V••••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $387M | +4.4% | 5 | $77.3M | 93% | 84% | 53 | 2 | |
| B•••••• W••••• independent RIA | $387M | +106% | 9 | $43.0M | 100% | 62% | 61 | 9 | |
| C••••• W••••• independent RIA | $386M | +40% | 7 | $55.2M | 100% | 79% | 40 | 1 | |
| S•••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $386M | +15% | 7 | $55.2M | 96% | 84% | 52 | 1 | |
| O•••••• F•••••••• C••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $386M | +22% | 3 | $129M | 94% | 70% | 186 | 1 | |
| E••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $386M | +17% | 8 | $48.3M | 100% | 70% | 52 | 8 | |
| C••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $386M | +17% | 4 | $96.5M | 65% | 82% | 53 | 1 | |
| W•••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $386M | +6.5% | 4 | $96.4M | 99% | 83% | 64 | 3 | |
| R•••• C•••••• A••••••• I••• independent RIA | $386M | +14% | 6 | $64.3M | 100% | 72% | 71 | 2 | |
| E•••••• W••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $386M | +14% | 12 | $32.1M | 97% | 67% | 51 | 1 | |
| R••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• I•• BD affiliated | $385M | +12% | 57 | $6.8M | 98% | 54% | 21 | 29 | |
| C•••• I••••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $385M | +9.7% | 3 | $128M | 100% | 85% | 103 | 3 | |
| P•• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $385M | +11% | 10 | $38.5M | 98% | 61% | 50 | 4 | |
| P•••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $385M | +38% | 5 | $77.0M | 96% | 75% | 74 | 2 | |
| K••••• F•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $384M | +28% | 3 | $128M | 98% | 87% | 84 | 1 | |
| P•••••• F•••••••• S••••••• independent RIA | $384M | +14% | 3 | $128M | 95% | 74% | 243 | 1 | |
| S•••••• P••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $384M | +11% | 3 | $128M | 94% | 87% | 65 | 1 | |
| A•••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $384M | +24% | 3 | $128M | 100% | 84% | 92 | 1 | |
| C••••••• C•••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $383M | +19% | 3 | $128M | 89% | 81% | 110 | 2 | |
| V•••• I••••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $383M | +19% | 7 | $54.7M | 98% | 66% | 70 | 2 | |
| C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $383M | +12% | 3 | $128M | 91% | 89% | 77 | 1 | |
| O•• • O•• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $383M | +41% | 5 | $76.6M | 96% | 88% | 50 | 1 | |
| C••••• 3•• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $383M | +21% | 6 | $63.8M | 92% | 87% | 52 | 1 | |
| F•••••••• P••••••• H•••••• I••• independent RIA | $382M | 5 | $76.5M | 100% | 85% | 48 | 2 | ||
| P•••••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $382M | +5.3% | 2 | $191M | 100% | 87% | 105 | 1 | |
| D•••••• C•••••• C••••••••• independent RIA | $382M | +15% | 8 | $47.8M | 100% | 72% | 33 | 5 | |
| B••• R••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $382M | +14% | 5 | $76.4M | 68% | 75% | 53 | 2 | |
| W•• F•••••••• independent RIA | $382M | +12% | 4 | $95.5M | 94% | 73% | 136 | 1 | |
| P••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $382M | +14% | 3 | $127M | 96% | 81% | 73 | 2 | |
| H•••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L••••• independent RIA | $382M | -19% | 5 | $76.3M | 83% | 85% | 35 | 2 | |
| U••••• W••••• S••••••••• independent RIA | $382M | +22% | 5 | $76.3M | 89% | 82% | 57 | 1 | |
| S•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $381M | +9.9% | 4 | $95.4M | 97% | 84% | 87 | 1 | |
| L•••••• P•••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $381M | +45% | 6 | $63.5M | 100% | 55% | 124 | 2 | |
| R•••• • R••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $381M | +5.6% | 2 | $191M | 74% | 63% | 70 | 2 | |
| W••••• B•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $381M | +24% | 2 | $190M | 73% | 89% | 75 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.