DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
4,728 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TABLEAUX WEALTH independent RIA | $230M | +49% | 5 | $45.9M | 100% | 71% | 42 | 5 | |
| RIGHTWEALTH ADVISORS, LLC independent RIA | $229M | +3.6% | 3 | $76.4M | 87% | 84% | 78 | 1 | |
| STERLING INVESTMENT ADVISORS,LLC independent RIA | $229M | +19% | 3 | $76.4M | 85% | 68% | 88 | 1 | |
| A•••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $229M | +19% | 2 | $115M | 99% | 82% | 95 | 1 | |
| H••••••••• F•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $229M | +35% | 4 | $57.3M | 100% | 58% | 96 | 6 | |
| L•• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $229M | +32% | 7 | $32.7M | 51% | 68% | 55 | 7 | |
| W••••••• I••••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $229M | +16% | 4 | $57.2M | 91% | 85% | 41 | 1 | |
| X• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $229M | +20% | 5 | $45.7M | 100% | 59% | 132 | 5 | |
| A•••••••• F••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $229M | -72% | 1 | $229M | 88% | 87% | 119 | 1 | |
| M•• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $228M | +18% | 4 | $57.1M | 93% | 58% | 104 | 2 | |
| W•••••••• C•••••• I••••••••• A••••••• S••••••• L•• independent RIA | $228M | +33% | 2 | $114M | 97% | 89% | 55 | 1 | |
| B•• C•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $228M | +17% | 5 | $45.7M | 97% | 82% | 39 | 5 | |
| B•••• A•••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $228M | +1.1% | 1 | $228M | 68% | 85% | 185 | 1 | 2 |
| S••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $228M | +5.6% | 4 | $57.0M | 98% | 55% | 89 | 1 | |
| W••••• F••••••• L•• independent RIA | $228M | +16% | 2 | $114M | 96% | 58% | 178 | 1 | |
| L•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $228M | 8 | $28.5M | 100% | 87% | 45 | 1 | ||
| C••••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• I•• independent RIA | $228M | +12% | 2 | $114M | 98% | 87% | 66 | 1 | |
| P••••• F•••••••• G•••• L•• independent RIA | $228M | +32% | 4 | $56.9M | 84% | 59% | 54 | 1 | |
| A••••••• R••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $227M | +14% | 2 | $114M | 99% | 84% | 70 | 2 | |
| K•••••• F•••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $227M | +25% | 1 | $227M | 94% | 87% | 198 | 1 | |
| E••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $227M | +17% | 6 | $37.9M | 100% | 67% | 34 | 1 | |
| R••••• S••••••• I•• independent RIA | $227M | +29% | 3 | $75.8M | 100% | 80% | 58 | 1 | |
| G••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $227M | +15% | 4 | $56.8M | 95% | 85% | 42 | 3 | |
| S••••••••• M•••• S••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $227M | +14% | 1 | $227M | 100% | 61% | 273 | 1 | |
| D•••••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $227M | +11% | 2 | $113M | 67% | 83% | 67 | 1 | |
| R••••••••• W••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $227M | +29% | 3 | $75.7M | 100% | 85% | 63 | 1 | |
| N••••• W••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $227M | -36% | 8 | $28.4M | 100% | 69% | 28 | 1 | |
| A••••• I••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $227M | +20% | 4 | $56.6M | 99% | 51% | 111 | 1 | |
| C•••••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $226M | +21% | 2 | $113M | 98% | 75% | 156 | 1 | |
| D••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $226M | +24% | 4 | $56.5M | 92% | 83% | 59 | 1 | |
| E•••••••• A••••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $226M | +9.8% | 3 | $75.3M | 100% | 60% | 126 | 2 | |
| V••••• F•••••••• S••••••• L•• independent RIA | $226M | +14% | 2 | $113M | 100% | 80% | 93 | 2 | |
| P•••••• F•••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $226M | 2 | $113M | 95% | 84% | 72 | 1 | ||
| M••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $226M | +18% | 3 | $75.2M | 93% | 77% | 92 | 1 | 1 |
| W••• A••••••• independent RIA | $226M | +20% | 4 | $56.4M | 100% | 62% | 179 | 1 | |
| G••••• V•••• I••••••••• C••••••••• independent RIA | $226M | +16% | 4 | $56.4M | 86% | 82% | 44 | 6 | 1 |
| R•• M••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $226M | +15% | 3 | $75.2M | 93% | 70% | 102 | 1 | |
| S••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $226M | +26% | 7 | $32.2M | 97% | 66% | 101 | 1 | |
| P••••••••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $225M | +14% | 2 | $113M | 93% | 77% | 114 | 1 | |
| A••• C•••••• M••••••••• L••••• independent RIA | $225M | +4.0% | 4 | $56.3M | 89% | 77% | 83 | 3 | |
| T•• P••••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $225M | +29% | 2 | $113M | 99% | 65% | 148 | 1 | |
| I•••• J•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $225M | +19% | 3 | $75.0M | 92% | 67% | 80 | 1 | |
| P•••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $225M | +18% | 4 | $56.3M | 89% | 87% | 38 | 5 | |
| D••••••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $225M | +18% | 7 | $32.1M | 98% | 62% | 139 | 1 | |
| S•• G•••• W••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $224M | +25% | 3 | $74.8M | 94% | 83% | 114 | 1 | |
| O••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $224M | +16% | 1 | $224M | 76% | 88% | 406 | 2 | |
| M•••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $224M | 3 | $74.8M | 99% | 86% | 43 | 1 | ||
| A••••• W••••• A••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• •••••• independent RIA | $224M | +33% | 4 | $56.1M | 93% | 89% | 52 | 1 | 1 |
| B••••• L••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $224M | +38% | 2 | $112M | 99% | 69% | 240 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• S•••• • A••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $224M | +9.1% | 3 | $74.7M | 100% | 81% | 62 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $224M | +6.7% | 2 | $112M | 97% | 87% | 85 | 1 | |
| J•• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $224M | +16% | 1 | $224M | 100% | 81% | 124 | 1 | |
| E••••• I••••••••• C••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $224M | +13% | 2 | $112M | 100% | 61% | 179 | 1 | |
| P•••••• P••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $224M | +7.9% | 2 | $112M | 95% | 84% | 91 | 1 | |
| G••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $224M | 3 | $74.6M | 99% | 84% | 56 | 1 | ||
| B••••• C•••••• A••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $224M | +47% | 2 | $112M | 100% | 77% | 92 | 2 | |
| N•••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $223M | +5.0% | 3 | $74.5M | 100% | 57% | 77 | 2 | |
| V••••• B•••• C•••••• G•••• independent RIA | $223M | +16% | 6 | $37.2M | 84% | 84% | 33 | 3 | |
| W••••• F•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $223M | +46% | 7 | $31.9M | 100% | 68% | 39 | 7 | |
| W••••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $223M | +16% | 5 | $44.6M | 99% | 60% | 78 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.