DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
1,074 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN LEEUWEN RETIREMENT & INVESTMENT SERVICES independent RIA | $559M | +21% | 2 | $280M | 98% | 65% | 350 | 1 | |
| HEADLAND CAPITAL independent RIA | $559M | +39% | 10 | $55.9M | 93% | 62% | 64 | 5 | |
| CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC independent RIA | $559M | +17% | 5 | $112M | 100% | 50% | 214 | 1 | |
| P•••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $559M | +11% | 3 | $186M | 99% | 83% | 126 | 2 | |
| K••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $555M | +26% | 6 | $92.5M | 100% | 80% | 79 | 1 | |
| V••••••• C•••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $551M | +17% | 8 | $68.9M | 100% | 80% | 102 | 1 | |
| S••••• F•••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $549M | +25% | 8 | $68.6M | 88% | 90% | 31 | 1 | |
| B•••• F•••••••• F••••••• L•• independent RIA | $546M | +25% | 7 | $78.1M | 98% | 79% | 137 | 2 | |
| M••••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $546M | +31% | 9 | $60.7M | 99% | 45% | 174 | 1 | |
| L••••• W••••• independent RIA | $546M | +15% | 5 | $109M | 100% | 83% | 99 | 1 | |
| W••••••••• S•••••• • C••• L•• independent RIA | $546M | +16% | 23 | $23.7M | 91% | 84% | 25 | 3 | |
| P•••••••• F•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $545M | +25% | 8 | $68.1M | 100% | 73% | 70 | 2 | |
| H••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $540M | +10% | 13 | $41.6M | 95% | 73% | 43 | 3 | |
| W••••• A••••••• O• I•••• L•• independent RIA | $539M | +19% | 11 | $49.0M | 97% | 78% | 48 | 1 | |
| M••••• F•••••••• C•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $538M | +15% | 10 | $53.8M | 99% | 83% | 29 | 1 | |
| J••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $534M | +23% | 5 | $107M | 99% | 84% | 204 | 2 | |
| A••••••••• P•••••• W••••• M••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $533M | +5.1% | 5 | $107M | 82% | 95% | 22 | 2 | |
| B••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $533M | +3.9% | 4 | $133M | 100% | 83% | 98 | 1 | |
| E•••• 3• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $532M | +7.7% | 4 | $133M | 93% | 100% | 1 | 3 | |
| B••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $529M | +11% | 5 | $106M | 98% | 86% | 63 | 2 | |
| W••••• C•••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $529M | +14% | 5 | $106M | 98% | 95% | 48 | 1 | |
| C•••••• F•••••••• A••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $527M | +19% | 6 | $87.9M | 100% | 70% | 172 | 1 | |
| C•••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $523M | +114% | 5 | $105M | 100% | 98% | 22 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• R•••• I••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $522M | +11% | 3 | $174M | 90% | 85% | 155 | 1 | |
| A••••• G••••••• I••• independent RIA | $521M | -21% | 14 | $37.2M | 84% | 70% | 80 | 10 | |
| F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• institutional | $520M | +12% | 2 | $260M | 0.3% | 1 | |||
| D•••• J••••••• F•••••••• S••••••• independent RIA | $519M | +11% | 6 | $86.6M | 82% | 70% | 89 | 1 | |
| N•••••••• F•••••••• C••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $519M | +17% | 9 | $57.7M | 99% | 70% | 56 | 3 | |
| M•••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $517M | +27% | 6 | $86.2M | 96% | 38% | 411 | 3 | |
| P•••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $515M | +11% | 5 | $103M | 100% | 92% | 48 | 1 | |
| G•• F•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $513M | +20% | 6 | $85.5M | 94% | 74% | 69 | 2 | |
| F•••••••• D•••••• C••••••••• independent RIA | $508M | +12% | 3 | $169M | 100% | 69% | 172 | 3 | |
| M••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $507M | +19% | 4 | $127M | 97% | 94% | 50 | 1 | |
| B•••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $507M | -21% | 4 | $127M | 98% | 95% | 76 | 1 | |
| B•••••• H••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $505M | 6 | $84.2M | 97% | 71% | 47 | 3 | ||
| F••• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $504M | +15% | 7 | $72.0M | 100% | 51% | 123 | 2 | |
| S•••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $502M | +28% | 6 | $83.7M | 91% | 91% | 30 | 8 | |
| B••••••• W••••• G•••• L•• independent RIA | $494M | +18% | 5 | $98.8M | 90% | 66% | 91 | 3 | |
| A••••• H••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $493M | 4 | $123M | 76% | 84% | 78 | 1 | ||
| P••••••• P••••••• L•• mixed wealth | $489M | +8.8% | 5 | $97.8M | 23% | 99% | 1 | ||
| W••• T••••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $489M | +25% | 5 | $97.8M | 94% | 73% | 115 | 1 | |
| O••••••••• S•••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $488M | +22% | 4 | $122M | 85% | 79% | 45 | 1 | |
| B••••• L••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $487M | +18% | 8 | $60.9M | 98% | 88% | 28 | 1 | |
| B••• • B•••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $487M | +16% | 3 | $162M | 99% | 80% | 167 | 1 | |
| T•• P•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $486M | +16% | 2 | $243M | 98% | 93% | 131 | 1 | |
| R••••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $484M | 3 | $161M | 99% | 96% | 11 | 1 | ||
| P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $483M | +3.7% | 8 | $60.4M | 97% | 91% | 18 | 3 | |
| A••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $483M | +13% | 6 | $80.6M | 100% | 96% | 31 | 1 | |
| J•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $483M | +15% | 3 | $161M | 95% | 95% | 62 | 1 | |
| T•• L•••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $482M | +54% | 6 | $80.4M | 100% | 92% | 51 | 1 | |
| A•• F•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $482M | +13% | 16 | $30.1M | 99% | 65% | 29 | 1 | |
| 1• W••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $481M | 9 | $53.5M | 100% | 67% | 76 | 3 | ||
| H• W••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $481M | +21% | 6 | $80.2M | 90% | 76% | 44 | 5 | |
| P••••••• P••• P•••••• C••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $481M | +21% | 1 | $481M | 93% | 66% | 689 | 2 | |
| M••••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• mixed wealth | $477M | +6.4% | 2 | $239M | 46% | 91% | 73 | 1 | |
| X••••• W••••• L•• independent RIA | $475M | +63% | 5 | $95.1M | 77% | 0.0% | 945 | 1 | |
| T•• S••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $471M | +19% | 4 | $118M | 100% | 89% | 70 | 1 | |
| Z• C•••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $467M | 3 | $156M | 89% | 65% | 101 | 1 | ||
| A••••••• P•••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $466M | 7 | $66.6M | 100% | 94% | 24 | 3 | ||
| C••••••• R•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $464M | +37% | 8 | $58.0M | 100% | 68% | 225 | 8 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.