DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
1,074 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE MENARD FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC independent RIA | $335M | -22% | 2 | $168M | 98% | 89% | 64 | 1 | |
| CHARTER ADVISORY CORPORATION independent RIA | $333M | -9.1% | 14 | $23.8M | 81% | 75% | 41 | 9 | |
| SOLANO WEALTH ADVISORS independent RIA | $332M | +11% | 3 | $111M | 97% | 78% | 152 | 1 | |
| E•••• F•••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $332M | +21% | 2 | $166M | 100% | 82% | 145 | 1 | |
| Y•••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $331M | +11% | 2 | $166M | 100% | 99% | 37 | 1 | |
| F••••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $330M | +11% | 5 | $65.9M | 98% | 35% | 50 | 1 | |
| T••••• G••••• • I••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $328M | +1.9% | 5 | $65.7M | 100% | 85% | 59 | 3 | |
| L•••• W••••• M••••••••• L••• independent RIA | $327M | +16% | 2 | $164M | 100% | 72% | 250 | 2 | |
| M••• A••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $327M | +2.0% | 15 | $21.8M | 95% | 58% | 38 | 8 | |
| V•••••• P•••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $327M | +18% | 15 | $21.8M | 100% | 62% | 81 | 8 | |
| T••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $325M | +24% | 3 | $108M | 99% | 88% | 90 | 1 | |
| A•••• P••••••••• G•••• I•• independent RIA | $321M | +15% | 2 | $161M | 100% | 79% | 165 | 1 | |
| V•••• F••••••• L•• independent RIA | $320M | +17% | 4 | $80.0M | 82% | 98% | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| A•••• W••••• M••••••••• A•• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $320M | -10% | 6 | $53.3M | 94% | 72% | 79 | 4 | |
| A••••• I••••• L•• other | $320M | -31% | 2 | $160M | 7.5% | 1 | |||
| I••••••••• • F•••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $319M | +14% | 3 | $106M | 100% | 26% | 250 | 2 | |
| T•••• C••• T••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $318M | +26% | 6 | $53.0M | 99% | 79% | 96 | 1 | |
| P•••••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $316M | +25% | 5 | $63.2M | 97% | 67% | 86 | 1 | |
| W••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $315M | +11% | 3 | $105M | 99% | 87% | 65 | 3 | |
| V•••• A•••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $315M | +22% | 3 | $105M | 98% | 54% | 229 | 1 | |
| M••••• P•••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $313M | +27% | 2 | $157M | 84% | 88% | 78 | 2 | |
| B•••• F••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $313M | +2.1% | 3 | $104M | 100% | 91% | 36 | 1 | |
| N••• independent RIA | $312M | +109% | 2 | $156M | 58% | 96% | 38 | 1 | |
| M•••••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $311M | +34% | 6 | $51.8M | 83% | 53% | 58 | 6 | |
| G••••• P•••••• W••••• independent RIA | $308M | +12% | 4 | $76.9M | 76% | 78% | 60 | 1 | |
| C•••••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $307M | +25% | 5 | $61.5M | 100% | 95% | 45 | 2 | |
| G•• S•••••••• independent RIA | $307M | +34% | 7 | $43.8M | 100% | 100% | 45 | 1 | |
| H••••••• A•••• A••••••• L•••• L•• independent RIA | $307M | +20% | 4 | $76.6M | 100% | 73% | 98 | 1 | |
| O••••••••• S••••••••• I••• BD affiliated | $306M | +2.1% | 336 | $911,037 | 100% | 7.4% | 7 | 121 | |
| J••• A•••• A•• A••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $306M | +8.3% | 3 | $102M | 89% | 66% | 92 | 2 | |
| K••••••••• • F•••••• I••• independent RIA | $305M | +25% | 3 | $102M | 89% | 78% | 146 | 2 | |
| G•••••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $304M | -4.3% | 2 | $152M | 98% | 97% | 69 | 1 | |
| C••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $302M | +6.0% | 2 | $151M | 77% | 90% | 58 | 1 | |
| P••••••• F•••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $299M | +21% | 3 | $99.7M | 98% | 34% | 172 | 1 | |
| M••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $298M | +13% | 8 | $37.2M | 100% | 75% | 73 | 4 | |
| G•••••••• P••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $297M | -15% | 3 | $99.1M | 99% | 73% | 194 | 1 | |
| U•• F•••••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $297M | -1.7% | 127 | $2.3M | 98% | 27% | 10 | 101 | |
| T•• Y••••• G•••• independent RIA | $296M | +12% | 5 | $59.3M | 98% | 84% | 94 | 1 | |
| A•••• C•••••• F••••• O•••••• L•• independent RIA | $296M | +36% | 6 | $49.3M | 97% | 93% | 25 | 4 | |
| P••••••• H••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $296M | +16% | 4 | $74.0M | 97% | 57% | 70 | 2 | |
| T•••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $295M | +7.9% | 1 | $295M | 71% | 99% | 62 | 1 | |
| B••••• F•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $295M | +16% | 14 | $21.0M | 99% | 41% | 63 | 7 | |
| M•• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $294M | 5 | $58.8M | 97% | 68% | 66 | 1 | ||
| L•••• I••••••••• A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $292M | +23% | 4 | $73.0M | 98% | 83% | 67 | 1 | |
| A••• S•••••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $292M | +29% | 7 | $41.7M | 98% | 69% | 85 | 1 | |
| G••••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $290M | +15% | 6 | $48.3M | 92% | 58% | 63 | 1 | |
| P•••••• S•• F•••••••• C••• independent RIA | $290M | +16% | 3 | $96.7M | 100% | 82% | 127 | 1 | |
| L••••• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $290M | +24% | 7 | $41.4M | 99% | 74% | 138 | 1 | |
| P••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• mixed wealth | $290M | +75% | 2 | $145M | 24% | 91% | 17 | 2 | |
| V••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $287M | +21% | 4 | $71.8M | 98% | 43% | 127 | 1 | |
| K••••• F•••••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $287M | +22% | 5 | $57.4M | 96% | 48% | 57 | 1 | |
| S•••••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $287M | +4.7% | 2 | $143M | 100% | 23% | 181 | 2 | |
| T•• H•••••• G••••• R••••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $286M | +33% | 3 | $95.4M | 99% | 29% | 248 | 1 | |
| F•••••••• F••••• I••• independent RIA | $286M | +3.5% | 4 | $71.4M | 100% | 54% | 143 | 1 | |
| O••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $285M | +11% | 2 | $143M | 100% | 79% | 118 | 2 | |
| P•••••• W•••••• I••• independent RIA | $285M | +21% | 3 | $95.0M | 100% | 94% | 35 | 4 | |
| M••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $285M | 2 | $143M | 100% | 85% | 100 | 1 | ||
| C••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $285M | +16% | 3 | $94.9M | 93% | 43% | 189 | 1 | |
| H•••• • H••••• independent RIA | $284M | +13% | 2 | $142M | 87% | 63% | 131 | 1 | |
| Z•• F••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $283M | 8 | $35.4M | 100% | 31% | 201 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.