DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
1,074 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STONEBRIDGE WEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC independent RIA | $283M | +22% | 3 | $94.4M | 100% | 78% | 96 | 1 | |
| B.A. SCHROCK WEALTH MANAGEMENT independent RIA | $282M | +40% | 5 | $56.3M | 100% | 49% | 141 | 1 | |
| FORTITUDE FINANCIAL LLC independent RIA | $282M | +4.2% | 4 | $70.4M | 100% | 51% | 102 | 2 | |
| R•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $281M | +21% | 4 | $70.2M | 95% | 83% | 45 | 1 | |
| H•••••• • S•••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $279M | +30% | 4 | $69.9M | 99% | 81% | 59 | 1 | |
| P•••••••• F••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $279M | +18% | 5 | $55.9M | 98% | 68% | 82 | 2 | |
| C••••••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $279M | -8.9% | 2 | $139M | 72% | 68% | 115 | 1 | 4 |
| H••••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $279M | +19% | 7 | $39.8M | 98% | 58% | 92 | 2 | |
| A••••••••• F•••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $278M | +1.4% | 1 | $278M | 100% | 86% | 193 | 2 | |
| B•••••• A••••••• G•••• L•• independent RIA | $277M | +17% | 15 | $18.5M | 87% | 60% | 56 | 2 | |
| C••••••••• A••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $276M | +17% | 5 | $55.3M | 95% | 81% | 55 | 1 | |
| C•••••• C•••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $275M | +18% | 2 | $137M | 98% | 87% | 100 | 1 | |
| T••••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $274M | +22% | 5 | $54.7M | 100% | 88% | 31 | 4 | |
| K••• W••••• P••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $273M | +18% | 7 | $39.0M | 100% | 56% | 75 | 2 | |
| N•••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $273M | +19% | 3 | $90.9M | 100% | 80% | 79 | 3 | |
| E• A• H•••••• L•• independent RIA | $273M | +23% | 10 | $27.3M | 97% | 35 | 1 | ||
| A••••••• W••••• M••••••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $272M | +16% | 5 | $54.5M | 79% | 48% | 141 | 4 | |
| C••••• F•••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• mixed wealth | $272M | +47% | 8 | $34.0M | 36% | 42% | 75 | 2 | |
| A••••••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $272M | +6.7% | 5 | $54.4M | 97% | 47% | 130 | 3 | |
| T••• B••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $272M | 3 | $90.5M | 98% | 72% | 190 | 2 | ||
| C•••••• F•••••••• C••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $269M | +17% | 4 | $67.3M | 100% | 96% | 27 | 1 | |
| L•• O••• C•••••• W••••• L•• mixed wealth | $269M | 3 | $89.7M | 22% | 95% | 14 | 1 | ||
| S••• I••••••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $268M | +19% | 3 | $89.5M | 100% | 75% | 102 | 2 | |
| J•• • A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $268M | -22% | 1 | $268M | 99% | 54% | 1,453 | 1 | |
| V•••••• P•••••• W••••• L•• independent RIA | $267M | +23% | 4 | $66.9M | 99% | 92% | 50 | 2 | |
| H•••••• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $266M | +39% | 3 | $88.7M | 84% | 89% | 41 | 1 | |
| T•• D••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $265M | +37% | 9 | $29.5M | 100% | 67% | 29 | 1 | |
| E•••••••• P•••••• W••••• independent RIA | $265M | +20% | 4 | $66.2M | 97% | 83% | 42 | 2 | |
| B•• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $265M | +5.0% | 4 | $66.2M | 76% | 78% | 110 | 5 | |
| I••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $265M | +21% | 2 | $132M | 96% | 85% | 89 | 1 | |
| S•••• W••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $263M | +22% | 1 | $263M | 100% | 84% | 147 | 2 | |
| K•••••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $262M | +23% | 5 | $52.3M | 100% | 50% | 87 | 3 | |
| W• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $262M | +16% | 2 | $131M | 94% | 44% | 454 | 2 | |
| W••••••••• I••••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $261M | +12% | 9 | $29.0M | 100% | 57% | 43 | 3 | |
| A•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $260M | +33% | 3 | $86.7M | 100% | 86% | 92 | 1 | |
| 7•• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $259M | +15% | 13 | $19.9M | 95% | 43% | 96 | 5 | |
| W•• B•••••••• S•••••••• I••• BD affiliated | $257M | +46% | 103 | $2.5M | 100% | 70 | |||
| T•••• F••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $257M | +12% | 4 | $64.2M | 100% | 16% | 268 | 1 | |
| S••• I••••••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $256M | +12% | 16 | $16.0M | 77% | 90% | 29 | 4 | 1 |
| P•••••••• F•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $256M | +15% | 1 | $256M | 100% | 77% | 319 | 2 | |
| R••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $256M | +15% | 4 | $63.9M | 100% | 70% | 80 | 6 | |
| T••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• other | $253M | +133% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| T••••• S••••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $253M | +65% | 4 | $63.1M | 89% | 38% | 191 | 1 | |
| T••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $251M | +18% | 4 | $62.8M | 99% | 87% | 35 | 1 | |
| B•••• C•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $250M | +29% | 2 | $125M | 96% | 100% | 1 | ||
| P•••••• R••••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $249M | +15% | 3 | $83.1M | 78% | 53% | 93 | 1 | |
| G••••• C•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $249M | -0.4% | 4 | $62.3M | 84% | 86% | 38 | 1 | |
| T•• C••••••• G•••• L•• independent RIA | $248M | +22% | 2 | $124M | 100% | 68% | 131 | 1 | |
| A•••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $248M | +12% | 2 | $124M | 100% | 95% | 49 | 1 | |
| A•• F•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $247M | +27% | 3 | $82.4M | 100% | 70% | 152 | 2 | |
| B•••• P•••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $244M | +13% | 4 | $61.0M | 95% | 85% | 53 | 3 | |
| P••••••• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $244M | +15% | 4 | $60.9M | 100% | 79% | 51 | 1 | |
| C••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $243M | -4.4% | 2 | $121M | 94% | 68% | 448 | 2 | |
| T••• W••••• A••••••• G•••• mixed wealth | $240M | +6.1% | 3 | $80.0M | 36% | 100% | 4 | ||
| I•• G•••• independent RIA | $240M | +14% | 6 | $40.0M | 100% | 48% | 45 | 1 | |
| M••••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $240M | +10% | 3 | $79.9M | 98% | 99% | 22 | 1 | |
| E• P••••••••• independent RIA | $239M | +79% | 3 | $79.8M | 99% | 41% | 260 | 1 | |
| B•••• L•• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $239M | +30% | 3 | $79.8M | 100% | 36% | 291 | 3 | |
| J•••• K•••• • A••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $239M | +16% | 4 | $59.8M | 98% | 97% | 11 | 1 | |
| R•••• R••••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $239M | +44% | 1 | $239M | 100% | 75% | 262 | 3 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.