DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
4,728 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BREACHWAY INVESTMENTS, LLC independent RIA | $165M | +19% | 1 | $165M | 97% | 62% | 242 | 2 | |
| WILKINSON WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC independent RIA | $165M | +15% | 2 | $82.4M | 95% | 84% | 102 | 1 | |
| SLO MONEY MANAGERS independent RIA | $165M | +25% | 2 | $82.3M | 85% | 72% | 70 | 1 | |
| W••••• F•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $165M | +24% | 3 | $54.9M | 94% | 85% | 47 | 1 | 1 |
| B•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $165M | +8.7% | 2 | $82.3M | 98% | 84% | 124 | 2 | |
| B•••• B••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $165M | +28% | 5 | $32.9M | 99% | 77% | 30 | 1 | |
| R•• C•••••• A••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $164M | +29% | 3 | $54.8M | 94% | 87% | 42 | 1 | |
| N••••• M•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $164M | +4.2% | 2 | $82.2M | 99% | 61% | 89 | 1 | |
| E•••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $164M | +19% | 3 | $54.7M | 100% | 79% | 34 | 1 | |
| E•• F•••••••• R•••••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $164M | +7.9% | 1 | $164M | 100% | 76% | 90 | 1 | |
| M••••••• M••••• L•• independent RIA | $164M | +21% | 2 | $81.9M | 100% | 69% | 81 | 3 | |
| R••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $163M | +4.8% | 1 | $163M | 100% | 73% | 159 | 1 | |
| F•••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $163M | +22% | 4 | $40.8M | 100% | 90% | 17 | 1 | |
| B••• C••• W•••••• I••• independent RIA | $163M | +8.3% | 1 | $163M | 90% | 56% | 337 | 1 | |
| I•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $163M | +29% | 2 | $81.6M | 100% | 79% | 84 | 2 | |
| A••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $163M | +3.7% | 3 | $54.4M | 100% | 75% | 66 | 1 | |
| C••••• F•••••••• P•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $163M | +12% | 2 | $81.5M | 99% | 64% | 121 | 2 | |
| D•••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $163M | +12% | 2 | $81.4M | 94% | 75% | 72 | 1 | |
| P•••••• W••••• M••••••••• O• N•••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $163M | +11% | 3 | $54.3M | 90% | 65% | 89 | 2 | |
| M••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $163M | +27% | 2 | $81.4M | 95% | 71% | 107 | 2 | |
| F••• F•••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $163M | +9.8% | 6 | $27.1M | 100% | 51% | 59 | 2 | |
| L••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $163M | +25% | 2 | $81.3M | 100% | 64% | 43 | 3 | |
| S••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $163M | +13% | 3 | $54.2M | 93% | 61% | 92 | 2 | |
| B••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $162M | +26% | 3 | $54.1M | 100% | 79% | 39 | 1 | |
| F••••• F•••••••• A••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $162M | +7.0% | 3 | $54.1M | 100% | 69% | 81 | 1 | |
| T•••••• W••••• independent RIA | $162M | +25% | 3 | $54.1M | 100% | 83% | 48 | 3 | |
| J••• B•••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $162M | +17% | 5 | $32.5M | 97% | 84% | 25 | 3 | |
| D••••• R••••• • S••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $162M | +14% | 3 | $54.1M | 81% | 87% | 47 | 2 | 12 |
| F•••••• F••••• O•••••• L•• independent RIA | $162M | +13% | 5 | $32.4M | 70% | 84% | 23 | 4 | |
| W•••••••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $162M | +12% | 1 | $162M | 96% | 89% | 79 | 2 | |
| S••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $162M | +43% | 4 | $40.5M | 100% | 61% | 108 | 2 | |
| R•• F•••••••• independent RIA | $162M | +26% | 5 | $32.4M | 100% | 74% | 52 | 3 | |
| K•••••••• C•••••• I••••••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $162M | +4.9% | 6 | $27.0M | 96% | 75% | 41 | 7 | |
| A•••• I••••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $162M | +23% | 2 | $81.0M | 100% | 71% | 48 | 2 | |
| I•••••• W••••• independent RIA | $162M | +53% | 6 | $27.0M | 100% | 56% | 55 | 2 | |
| F••• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $162M | -7.5% | 1 | $162M | 94% | 90% | 67 | 1 | |
| J•••••• M••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $162M | +27% | 16 | $10.1M | 94% | 70% | 22 | 6 | |
| L•••••••• • C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $162M | +20% | 3 | $53.8M | 97% | 55% | 94 | 2 | |
| F••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $161M | 5 | $32.3M | 95% | 73% | 39 | 1 | ||
| B••• • H••••• F•••••••• P•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $161M | +12% | 2 | $80.7M | 96% | 55% | 209 | 1 | |
| L••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $161M | +25% | 4 | $40.3M | 96% | 68% | 72 | 2 | |
| T•• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $161M | +19% | 2 | $80.6M | 95% | 75% | 76 | 2 | |
| B•••••• C•••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $161M | +31% | 2 | $80.6M | 65% | 51% | 101 | 3 | 1 |
| W••••••• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $161M | +15% | 1 | $161M | 99% | 58% | 473 | 1 | |
| M•••••• W••••• P•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $161M | +23% | 4 | $40.2M | 99% | 72% | 49 | 3 | |
| G•••• C••• • W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $161M | 9 | $17.9M | 89% | 53% | 36 | 3 | ||
| R••••••• • P•••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $161M | +19% | 3 | $53.6M | 100% | 83% | 86 | 1 | |
| S•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $161M | +17% | 4 | $40.2M | 100% | 89% | 26 | 2 | |
| D••••• F•••••••• M••••••••• P••• independent RIA | $161M | +8.6% | 2 | $80.3M | 98% | 64% | 131 | 1 | |
| C•••••• F••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $161M | +14% | 1 | $161M | 100% | 79% | 172 | 1 | |
| K••••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $160M | +13% | 4 | $40.1M | 93% | 61% | 55 | 2 | |
| W••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $160M | 3 | $53.5M | 100% | 61% | 105 | 1 | ||
| S•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $160M | +31% | 3 | $53.4M | 96% | 72% | 48 | 4 | |
| O•• O•• F•••••••• P•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $160M | +4.5% | 2 | $80.1M | 100% | 64% | 132 | 1 | |
| M• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $160M | 2 | $80.1M | 100% | 56% | 243 | 1 | ||
| H•••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $160M | +18% | 3 | $53.4M | 96% | 83% | 31 | 1 | |
| T•• W••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $160M | -45% | 5 | $32.0M | 97% | 85% | 30 | 4 | |
| A•••• P•••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $160M | +15% | 2 | $80.1M | 100% | 85% | 50 | 2 | |
| P•••••••• F•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $160M | +13% | 1 | $160M | 54% | 78% | 128 | 1 | |
| S••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $160M | +7.4% | 4 | $40.0M | 100% | 54% | 77 | 5 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.