DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filed
A practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several. The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFE PLANNING PARTNERS, INC. independent RIA | $354M | +13% | 3 | $118M | 100% | 96% | 37 | 1 | |
| CORE ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL, LLC asset manager | $354M | -19% | 1 | $354M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| WAYFINDING FINANCIAL, LLC independent RIA | $353M | +12% | 2 | $177M | 100% | 77% | 181 | 1 | |
| A•••• • C•• mixed wealth | $353M | -6.3% | 1 | $353M | 36% | 73% | 97 | 1 | |
| G•••••• F•••••••• S••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $353M | +11% | 2 | $176M | 100% | 66% | 157 | 1 | |
| A••••••••• I•••••••• P••••••• C••••••••• independent RIA | $351M | +8.6% | 1 | $351M | 100% | 48% | 880 | 1 | |
| D••• R••••• R••••••• L•• independent RIA | $351M | +12% | 3 | $117M | 100% | 96% | 58 | 1 | |
| F•••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $351M | +13% | 3 | $117M | 83% | 87% | 179 | 1 | |
| H••••••• R••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $351M | +24% | 3 | $117M | 90% | 68% | 115 | 1 | |
| T•••• B••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $351M | +14% | 2 | $175M | 58% | 90% | 79 | 1 | |
| T•••• P•••••• W••••• I••• other | $350M | +18% | 1 | $350M | 19% | 93% | 288 | 2 | |
| B•••••• M•••• • A••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $349M | +11% | 3 | $116M | 88% | 92% | 55 | 1 | |
| S••••••••• P••••••••• independent RIA | $348M | +105% | 1 | $348M | 100% | 100% | 255 | 2 | |
| A••••••• R••••••••• P••••••• G•••• I•• independent RIA | $348M | +20% | 2 | $174M | 63% | 61% | 398 | 1 | |
| P•••• K••••• L•• independent RIA | $347M | +11% | 2 | $173M | 89% | 8.7% | 61 | 1 | |
| L••• R••• I••••••••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $346M | +9.8% | 2 | $173M | 100% | 100% | 1 | ||
| G•••• E•• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $346M | -1.3% | 1 | $346M | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | ||
| R••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $346M | +10% | 2 | $173M | 99% | 87% | 110 | 1 | |
| B•••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $346M | +345951% | 1 | $346M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| T•• C•••• G•••• A•••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $344M | +18% | 3 | $115M | 99% | 76% | 153 | 1 | |
| M••••• B••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $343M | +25% | 3 | $114M | 94% | 76% | 82 | 1 | |
| A••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $342M | +15% | 1 | $342M | 83% | 93% | 97 | 1 | |
| L••••• B••••• W••••• L•• other | $342M | +71% | 1 | $342M | 3.4% | 100% | 3 | 1 | |
| S••••• 5• F•••••••• independent RIA | $342M | +26% | 2 | $171M | 100% | 88% | 78 | 1 | |
| D•••• I••••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $341M | +32% | 3 | $114M | 100% | 100% | 1 | 2 | |
| T••••• W••••• A•••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $341M | +6.6% | 1 | $341M | 98% | 100% | 1 | ||
| T•••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $341M | +9.3% | 1 | $341M | 100% | 95% | 98 | 1 | |
| R••••••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $341M | +3.2% | 3 | $114M | 85% | 98% | 36 | 1 | |
| R• P•••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $341M | +27% | 1 | $341M | 100% | 100% | 1 | ||
| W•••••••• R••••••• • M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $341M | +8.3% | 2 | $170M | 98% | 82% | 112 | 1 | |
| P••••• G••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $341M | +14% | 3 | $114M | 66% | 98% | 15 | 1 | |
| P••••••• W••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $341M | +19% | 2 | $170M | 96% | 79% | 156 | 1 | |
| R•••••••• F•••••••• S••••••• independent RIA | $341M | +10% | 1 | $341M | 100% | 76% | 320 | 1 | |
| S•••••• • C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $341M | +8.6% | 2 | $170M | 97% | 85% | 102 | 1 | |
| T••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $339M | +25% | 3 | $113M | 94% | 29% | 810 | 1 | |
| E•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $339M | +5.2% | 3 | $113M | 96% | 95% | 39 | 1 | |
| L•••• F•••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $339M | -21% | 3 | $113M | 100% | 99% | 29 | 1 | |
| N•••••••• M•••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $338M | +15% | 2 | $169M | 87% | 80% | 131 | 1 | |
| M••• • A••• W••••• C••••••• A•• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $338M | +16% | 2 | $169M | 99% | 87% | 110 | 1 | |
| B•••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $338M | +16% | 2 | $169M | 99% | 88% | 87 | 1 | |
| L••• L••••• I••••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $337M | +8.6% | 1 | $337M | 99% | 87% | 270 | 1 | |
| T•• N•••• S••••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $337M | +15% | 3 | $112M | 100% | 66% | 167 | 1 | |
| N•• E•••••• R••••••• • M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $337M | +1.1% | 3 | $112M | 98% | 92% | 50 | 1 | |
| M••••••• K•••••• • W••••• I•• independent RIA | $337M | +9.3% | 3 | $112M | 88% | 77% | 60 | 1 | |
| A•• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $336M | +8.6% | 3 | $112M | 99% | 72% | 185 | 1 | |
| T•• M••••• F•••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $335M | -22% | 2 | $168M | 98% | 89% | 64 | 1 | |
| T••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $335M | +18% | 2 | $168M | 100% | 83% | 132 | 1 | |
| A••••••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $335M | 3 | $112M | 100% | 80% | 128 | 1 | ||
| A••• C•••••• M••••••••• L• mixed wealth | $335M | -52% | 1 | $335M | 41% | 100% | 1 | 2 | |
| B••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $335M | +14% | 2 | $167M | 84% | 88% | 132 | 1 | |
| H••••• F•••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $334M | +12% | 1 | $334M | 99% | 86% | 217 | 1 | |
| E••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $334M | -2.2% | 2 | $167M | 100% | 100% | 113 | 1 | |
| V•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $333M | +10% | 1 | $333M | 100% | 99% | 44 | 1 | |
| F•••••••• F•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $333M | +12% | 2 | $167M | 92% | 92% | 69 | 1 | |
| D••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $333M | +11% | 3 | $111M | 98% | 74% | 286 | 1 | |
| D••••••••• • A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $333M | +6.6% | 3 | $111M | 85% | 84% | 105 | 1 | |
| O•••••• P•••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $333M | +10% | 1 | $333M | 100% | 100% | 2 | ||
| O••••••• W••••• independent RIA | $332M | +22% | 3 | $111M | 80% | 78% | 329 | 1 | |
| D•••• A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $332M | 2 | $166M | 70% | 100% | 1 | 3 | ||
| S••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $332M | +11% | 3 | $111M | 97% | 78% | 152 | 1 |
3,948 practices match (Solo or small team). Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.