DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
4,728 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPITAL WEALTH ALLIANCE, LLC independent RIA | $300M | +36% | 3 | $100M | 100% | 74% | 116 | 1 | |
| WEALTH ADVISORS NETWORK, INC. independent RIA | $300M | +1.1% | 8 | $37.5M | 87% | 64% | 59 | 8 | |
| OPTIMUM FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC independent RIA | $300M | +11% | 3 | $100M | 95% | 85% | 79 | 1 | |
| G••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $300M | +12% | 4 | $75.0M | 99% | 80% | 64 | 5 | |
| A•••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $300M | +12% | 5 | $60.0M | 98% | 79% | 48 | 1 | |
| B••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $300M | +18% | 5 | $60.0M | 96% | 86% | 38 | 2 | |
| S•••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $300M | +19% | 4 | $74.9M | 79% | 79% | 296 | 1 | |
| M•••• W••••• independent RIA | $299M | +21% | 4 | $74.9M | 65% | 51% | 113 | 2 | |
| S•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $299M | +33% | 8 | $37.4M | 98% | 57% | 71 | 7 | |
| K••••••• • G••••••• W••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $299M | +12% | 2 | $150M | 100% | 88% | 139 | 2 | |
| V••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $299M | 1 | $299M | 100% | 64% | 362 | 1 | ||
| C••••••• H••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $299M | -10% | 1 | $299M | 95% | 88% | 183 | 1 | |
| A••• W••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $299M | +45% | 7 | $42.6M | 100% | 76% | 35 | 1 | |
| B••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $299M | +24% | 2 | $149M | 98% | 83% | 85 | 2 | |
| I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $298M | +17% | 5 | $59.6M | 100% | 67% | 56 | 2 | |
| M••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $298M | +13% | 8 | $37.2M | 100% | 75% | 73 | 4 | |
| I••••••••• A•••• A••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $298M | 12 | $24.8M | 100% | 69% | 31 | 4 | ||
| W••••• F•••••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $298M | +29% | 6 | $49.7M | 100% | 70% | 71 | 7 | |
| I•• A•••• M••••••••• L••• independent RIA | $298M | +5.3% | 2 | $149M | 83% | 63% | 293 | 3 | |
| S•••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $298M | +18% | 3 | $99.2M | 100% | 59% | 216 | 1 | |
| G•••••••• P••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $297M | -15% | 3 | $99.1M | 99% | 73% | 194 | 1 | |
| O••••••• independent RIA | $297M | +16% | 4 | $74.3M | 79% | 88% | 52 | 1 | |
| T••••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $297M | +15% | 3 | $99.0M | 100% | 90% | 67 | 1 | |
| C••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $297M | +14% | 5 | $59.4M | 60% | 69% | 102 | 2 | |
| S••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $297M | +16% | 2 | $148M | 77% | 80% | 167 | 1 | |
| B••••••••• independent RIA | $296M | +14% | 6 | $49.4M | 95% | 82% | 52 | 2 | |
| B••• I••••• independent RIA | $296M | +20% | 3 | $98.8M | 98% | 59% | 217 | 1 | |
| T•• Y••••• G•••• independent RIA | $296M | +12% | 5 | $59.3M | 98% | 84% | 94 | 1 | |
| P••••••• H••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $296M | +16% | 4 | $74.0M | 97% | 57% | 70 | 2 | |
| G••••• B•• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $296M | +15% | 2 | $148M | 86% | 67% | 74 | 1 | |
| H•• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $295M | +15% | 3 | $98.4M | 90% | 86% | 56 | 1 | |
| 3•• I••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $295M | 4 | $73.8M | 100% | 62% | 233 | 2 | ||
| K•••• F•••••••• S•••••••• independent RIA | $295M | +15% | 2 | $147M | 85% | 81% | 84 | 1 | |
| M•••••• P••• C•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $295M | +8.1% | 4 | $73.7M | 94% | 73% | 90 | 1 | |
| E••••• M••••••••• C••••••••• independent RIA | $294M | +20% | 2 | $147M | 100% | 74% | 178 | 2 | |
| C••••••••• K••• • A••••••••• I••••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $294M | +7.5% | 9 | $32.7M | 100% | 66% | 60 | 1 | |
| B•••• • A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $294M | +11% | 2 | $147M | 100% | 88% | 80 | 1 | |
| E•••• B••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $294M | +27% | 3 | $98.1M | 96% | 87% | 55 | 1 | |
| M••• B••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $294M | +7.4% | 3 | $98.1M | 78% | 50% | 178 | 1 | |
| M•• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $294M | 5 | $58.8M | 97% | 68% | 66 | 1 | ||
| R••••••• W••••• A••••••• I••• independent RIA | $294M | +14% | 3 | $97.9M | 72% | 77% | 265 | 1 | |
| P•••••• P••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $293M | +6.3% | 2 | $147M | 99% | 62% | 130 | 1 | |
| F•••••••• F•••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $293M | +18% | 6 | $48.9M | 97% | 84% | 36 | 6 | |
| B•••••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $293M | +14% | 3 | $97.6M | 95% | 84% | 108 | 1 | |
| K••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $293M | +14% | 5 | $58.6M | 95% | 83% | 41 | 2 | |
| H••••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $293M | +16% | 4 | $73.1M | 98% | 66% | 109 | 1 | |
| C••••••••• F•••••••• G•••••••• independent RIA | $292M | 5 | $58.4M | 96% | 83% | 69 | 5 | ||
| E••••••••• W••••• • F••••• O••••• independent RIA | $292M | 6 | $48.7M | 62% | 70% | 31 | 2 | ||
| L•••• I••••••••• A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $292M | +23% | 4 | $73.0M | 98% | 83% | 67 | 1 | |
| A••• S•••••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $292M | +29% | 7 | $41.7M | 98% | 69% | 85 | 1 | |
| F••• C•••••• F•••••••• S••••••• independent RIA | $292M | 2 | $146M | 100% | 75% | 145 | 1 | ||
| N•• W••••• G•••• independent RIA | $292M | 1 | $292M | 97% | 89% | 128 | 1 | ||
| M••••• A••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $292M | +13% | 2 | $146M | 92% | 76% | 166 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $292M | +20% | 4 | $72.9M | 98% | 84% | 60 | 1 | |
| S•••• M•••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $292M | +13% | 3 | $97.2M | 94% | 80% | 67 | 2 | 1 |
| T•• P••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $291M | +24% | 4 | $72.9M | 95% | 82% | 63 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $291M | +30% | 5 | $58.3M | 100% | 58% | 37 | 1 | |
| V•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $291M | +24% | 3 | $97.0M | 100% | 56% | 145 | 1 | |
| L•••• B•••••• • C••• L•• independent RIA | $291M | +1.8% | 18 | $16.1M | 90% | 53% | 38 | 9 | |
| M••••• C•••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $290M | +203% | 4 | $72.6M | 67% | 66% | 72 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.