DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
3,944 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIBERT WEALTH MANAGEMENT independent RIA | $316M | 2 | $158M | 100% | 94% | 58 | 1 | ||
| PACIFICA PARTNERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT independent RIA | $316M | +25% | 1 | $316M | 75% | 68% | 544 | 2 | |
| THAMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT independent RIA | $315M | +15% | 2 | $158M | 94% | 83% | 146 | 1 | |
| F•••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $315M | +32% | 1 | $315M | 90% | 97% | 57 | 1 | |
| B••••• • S••••• L•• independent RIA | $315M | +20% | 3 | $105M | 100% | 82% | 100 | 1 | |
| V•••• A•••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $315M | +22% | 3 | $105M | 98% | 54% | 229 | 1 | |
| G•••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $315M | +32% | 2 | $157M | 98% | 99% | 38 | 1 | |
| T•• F••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $314M | +26% | 1 | $314M | 100% | 66% | 224 | 1 | |
| R••••••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $314M | +8.1% | 1 | $314M | 99% | 96% | 115 | 1 | |
| P•••••••• S••••••••• I• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $314M | +6.0% | 3 | $105M | 100% | 85% | 73 | 1 | |
| S•••• M•••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $313M | +36% | 2 | $157M | 98% | 74% | 127 | 1 | |
| B•••• F••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $313M | +2.1% | 3 | $104M | 100% | 91% | 36 | 1 | |
| N••• independent RIA | $312M | +109% | 2 | $156M | 58% | 96% | 38 | 1 | |
| M••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $312M | +30% | 2 | $156M | 97% | 99% | 37 | 1 | |
| C•••••• • C•••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $311M | +25% | 3 | $104M | 89% | 87% | 70 | 1 | |
| T•• P•••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $311M | +2.2% | 2 | $155M | 100% | 96% | 53 | 1 | |
| G••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $310M | -0.8% | 1 | $310M | 81% | 98% | 53 | 1 | |
| P•• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $310M | +77% | 2 | $155M | 100% | 91% | 82 | 1 | |
| N•• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $310M | +39% | 2 | $155M | 98% | 81% | 144 | 1 | |
| B••• O•• F•••• I••••• A••••••• S••••••• L•• other | $310M | -2.9% | 1 | $310M | 1.5% | 100% | 1 | 1 | |
| T••••••• F•••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $309M | +20% | 3 | $103M | 97% | 63% | 146 | 1 | |
| P••••••• C•••••• A•••••••• L•• asset manager | $309M | +7.4% | 1 | $309M | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | ||
| A•• C•••••• independent RIA | $309M | +6.2% | 2 | $155M | 96% | 91% | 118 | 1 | |
| C•••••••• • A••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $308M | +10% | 2 | $154M | 65% | 97% | 23 | 1 | |
| Y•• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $308M | +24% | 1 | $308M | 100% | 59% | 523 | 1 | |
| G••••••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $308M | +14% | 2 | $154M | 100% | 97% | 40 | 1 | |
| C•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $308M | +15% | 2 | $154M | 99% | 84% | 84 | 1 | |
| P••••••• R••••••••• I•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $308M | -0.7% | 3 | $103M | 96% | 68% | 84 | 1 | |
| C••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $307M | +23% | 2 | $154M | 100% | 54% | 269 | 1 | |
| K•••• M• G••••• A•• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $307M | +3.6% | 2 | $153M | 99% | 95% | 54 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $306M | +17% | 3 | $102M | 100% | 59% | 70 | 1 | |
| F•••••• I• independent RIA | $306M | +26% | 1 | $306M | 72% | 73% | 246 | 1 | |
| M•• A•••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $306M | +20% | 2 | $153M | 99% | 89% | 90 | 1 | |
| R••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $305M | 3 | $102M | 100% | 29% | 204 | 1 | ||
| R••••••••• C•••••• S••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $305M | +3.3% | 2 | $153M | 98% | 73% | 131 | 1 | |
| B•••• C•••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $305M | +21% | 1 | $305M | 81% | 84% | 68 | 1 | |
| F••••• F••••••• I•• independent RIA | $305M | +12% | 2 | $152M | 100% | 82% | 144 | 1 | |
| C•••• C•••••• A•••• M••••••••• L••••• independent RIA | $304M | +18% | 1 | $304M | 95% | 100% | 18 | 1 | |
| P••••••••• F•••••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $304M | +15% | 2 | $152M | 98% | 85% | 82 | 1 | |
| G•• I••••••••• G•••• other | $304M | +11% | 1 | $304M | 11% | 83% | 1 | ||
| B••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $304M | +9.8% | 2 | $152M | 97% | 90% | 137 | 1 | |
| G•••••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $304M | -4.3% | 2 | $152M | 98% | 97% | 69 | 1 | |
| C•••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $304M | -23% | 1 | $304M | 86% | 91% | 157 | 2 | |
| C••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $303M | +23% | 1 | $303M | 100% | 81% | 265 | 1 | |
| I••••••••• F•••••••• S••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $303M | +34% | 1 | $303M | 95% | 84% | 203 | 1 | |
| B••••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $303M | +21% | 3 | $101M | 100% | 84% | 51 | 1 | |
| A•••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $303M | +54% | 1 | $303M | 66% | 97% | 40 | 1 | 2 |
| C••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $302M | +6.0% | 2 | $151M | 77% | 90% | 58 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $301M | +20% | 2 | $151M | 95% | 71% | 162 | 1 | |
| B••• D•••••• C•••••• I••••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $301M | 2 | $151M | 73% | 96% | 1 | 10 | ||
| S•••••••• F••••• O••••• independent RIA | $301M | +10% | 3 | $100M | 100% | 81% | 76 | 1 | |
| J•••••• F•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $301M | +24% | 2 | $150M | 100% | 73% | 149 | 1 | |
| V•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $301M | +13% | 2 | $150M | 85% | 78% | 148 | 1 | |
| S••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $300M | +17% | 2 | $150M | 100% | 62% | 248 | 1 | |
| W••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $300M | -11% | 2 | $150M | 94% | 92% | 63 | 1 | 1 |
| C•••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $300M | +36% | 3 | $100M | 100% | 74% | 116 | 1 | |
| S••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $300M | +12% | 3 | $100M | 97% | 48% | 309 | 1 | |
| O•••••• F•••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $300M | +11% | 3 | $100M | 95% | 85% | 79 | 1 | |
| K••••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $300M | +2.4% | 1 | $300M | 100% | 45% | 741 | 1 | |
| C•••••• W••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $300M | +9.0% | 2 | $150M | 100% | 5.2% | 87 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.