DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
627 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAUSEY PUBLIC FINANCE institutional | $431M | +3.6% | 1 | $431M | 1.8% | 100% | 2 | ||
| QBOX FIDUCIARY SOLUTIONS, LLC institutional | $429M | -1.1% | 1 | $429M | 6.9% | 50% | 127 | 1 | |
| BELAY INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC institutional | $427M | +19% | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | ||||
| P••••••••• A••••••• L•• institutional | $422M | +6.9% | 2 | $211M | 3.6% | 58% | 13 | 1 | |
| L••••••• A••••••• L•• institutional | $415M | +2.9% | 0.0% | 2 | |||||
| Z•••• L•• institutional | $411M | +5.6% | 3 | $137M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| N••••••• other | $408M | +16% | 1 | $408M | 10% | 98% | 1 | ||
| M••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $408M | 1 | $408M | 0.0% | 1 | ||||
| H•••• J•••• I••••••••• M••••••••• I••• institutional | $402M | +9.0% | 1 | $402M | 3.5% | 95% | 52 | 1 | |
| B••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $397M | +27% | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| E•••• I••• institutional | $396M | +71% | 5 | $79.1M | 2.4% | 99% | 1 | 8 | |
| A•••• R••• A••••• U• institutional | $394M | -78% | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | ||||
| T•••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• L•• institutional | $388M | +13% | 4 | $97.1M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| P••••••••• C•••••• C••••••••• institutional | $380M | +4.2% | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| S••••• M••••••••• institutional | $380M | -6.1% | 4 | $95.0M | 6.6% | 48% | 25 | 1 | |
| M••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• ••••• A••••••• L•••••• institutional | $378M | -98% | 3 | $126M | 0.0% | 3 | |||
| U•••••••• A•••••••• I••• institutional | $373M | +17% | 1 | $373M | 0.2% | 1 | |||
| E•••••••• C•••••• L•• institutional | $368M | +7.6% | 5 | $73.6M | 2.0% | 61% | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| A••••• C••••••• L•• institutional | $362M | -30% | 10 | $36.2M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| U• A•••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $358M | +12% | 4 | $89.6M | 2.6% | 100% | 1 | ||
| B••••• C••• C••••••• L•• institutional | $355M | -9.8% | 7.8% | 100% | 1 | ||||
| N••••••• F•••••••• L•• other | $338M | +13% | 3 | $113M | 15% | 19% | 40 | 1 | |
| 3•• C•••••• institutional | $338M | +25% | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| R•• R••••••••• P••• A••••••• institutional | $336M | +24% | 4 | $84.1M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| G••••• institutional | $335M | +62% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| C••••••• T••• F•••••••• S•••••••• L•• institutional | $325M | 6 | $54.2M | 0.0% | 1 | ||||
| M•••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L• institutional | $321M | +12% | 0.0% | 3 | |||||
| A••••• I••••• L•• other | $320M | -31% | 2 | $160M | 7.5% | 1 | |||
| G•••••• P••••••• I••• institutional | $318M | +10% | 1 | $318M | 1.9% | 1 | |||
| N••••••• 4•••• L•• institutional | $318M | +23% | 4 | $79.5M | 0.0% | 2 | |||
| H•••••••• F•••• institutional | $318M | -39% | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | ||||
| B•••• C•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $317M | +17% | 1 | $317M | 8.3% | 53% | 76 | 1 | |
| M•••••••• A••••••••• I••• institutional | $316M | -33% | 3 | $105M | 1.0% | 100% | 0 | 2 | |
| G••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $314M | +40% | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 4••• I••••••••• P••••••••• institutional | $311M | +0.0% | 4 | $77.8M | 7.4% | 13% | 17 | 2 | |
| E•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• other | $310M | +14% | 5 | $62.1M | 15% | 9.3% | 2 | ||
| C••••••••• P••••••• L• institutional | $308M | 0.0% | 1 | ||||||
| O•• S••• R••••••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• L•• institutional | $305M | -11% | 2 | $153M | 0.0% | 7 | 1 | ||
| Y•• D•••• • A••••••••• I•• institutional | $305M | +8.3% | 2 | $152M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| N••••••• C•••••• R••••••••• S•••••••• I••• institutional | $304M | +16% | 10 | $30.4M | 0.0% | 2 | |||
| G•• I••••••••• G•••• other | $304M | +11% | 1 | $304M | 11% | 83% | 1 | ||
| B•• C•••••• A••••••• L•• institutional | $301M | +1.5% | 2 | $151M | 1.4% | 98% | 2 | 1 | |
| C••• L•• institutional | $300M | +8.6% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| U•••• H••••••• C•••••• institutional | $295M | +5.5% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| H•••• C••• C••••••• L•• other | $292M | +133% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| L••••• F•••••••• • E••••••• A••••••• S••••••• institutional | $286M | -5.1% | 0.0% | 2 | |||||
| G••••••• P•••••••• L•• institutional | $286M | +16% | 2 | $143M | 4.3% | 100% | 1 | ||
| B•••••• A••••••• other | $284M | +171% | 12% | 100% | 2 | ||||
| D•••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $277M | +12% | 6 | $46.2M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| M•••••••• I••••••••• I••• other | $277M | +22% | 2 | $139M | 16% | 72% | 35 | 1 | |
| P•••••••• F•••••••• institutional | $277M | 2 | $139M | 0.0% | 1 | ||||
| R••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• other | $273M | 0.0% | 1 | ||||||
| A••••••• R••••••••• S••••••••• L•• institutional | $272M | +13% | 1 | $272M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| P•••••••• I••••••••• P•••••••• L•• institutional | $271M | +12% | 1 | $271M | 4.1% | 64% | 54 | 1 | |
| B•••••••• P•••••••• L•• institutional | $271M | +147% | 1 | $271M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| A•••• F•••••••• S•••••••• I••• other | $269M | +4.5% | 4 | $67.3M | 14% | 47% | 30 | 3 | |
| A••••••• institutional | $269M | +42% | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | ||||
| R••••••••• P••••••••• I••• institutional | $266M | +30% | 2 | $133M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| G•••••• A•••••••• L•• other | $266M | +5.6% | 1 | $266M | 3.3% | 93% | 3 | 1 | |
| E•••••• G•••• other | $265M | +160% | 5 | $53.0M | 20% | 60% | 17 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.