DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
17,149 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELLS FARGO INVESTMENT INSTITUTE, INC. independent RIA | $43B | +5.3% | 51 | $843M | 81% | 100% | 219 | 3 | |
| JASPER RIDGE PARTNERS, L.P. other | $43B | +7.1% | 1.9% | 100% | 4 | 16 | |||
| VINVA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT other | $43B | 0.0% | 1 | ||||||
| G••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L••• asset manager | $43B | +50% | 0.0% | 4 | 18 | ||||
| P•••••• L••• F••• A••••••• L•• asset manager | $43B | +4.2% | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| C•••••• G•••• P•••••• C••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $43B | +11% | 105 | $407M | 74% | 100% | 7 | 1 | |
| C••••• L•••••• asset manager | $43B | 0.0% | 1 | 22 | |||||
| E•••••• P•••••••• L•• other | $43B | +11% | 1 | $43B | 0.3% | 100% | 10 | 1 | 6 |
| F••••••• M••••• A•••••••• L•• asset manager | $43B | +11% | 6.8% | 100% | 1 | ||||
| L••• independent RIA | $43B | +46% | 319 | $133M | 90% | 96% | 41 | 46 | 22 |
| E•••••••• A•••••••• L•• national BD | $42B | +23% | 4,647 | $9.1M | 97% | 78% | 15 | 886 | |
| N••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $42B | +8.1% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| T••••• P•••• H••• K••• L•••••• asset manager | $42B | +94% | 0.0% | 2 | |||||
| P••• M••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $42B | +8.1% | 1 | $42B | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| S••••••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $42B | -27% | 0.0% | 2 | |||||
| S••••• P•••••••• L••• asset manager | $42B | -3.7% | 0.0% | 4 | 87 | ||||
| C••••• institutional | $42B | +11% | 0.0% | 6 | |||||
| P•••• A•••••••• I••• asset manager | $42B | -16% | 21 | $2.0B | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| D••• D••••••• • C•• independent RIA | $42B | +16% | 698 | $59.9M | 90% | 63% | 98 | 101 | |
| A•••••• I••••••••• G••••• L••• asset manager | $42B | +32% | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| S••••••• A•••• M••••••••• I••• institutional | $42B | -5.1% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| F•••• A•••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $41B | +22% | 43 | $965M | 83% | 78% | 773 | 1 | |
| S•••••••• G•••• R••• A••••• L• asset manager | $41B | +11% | 0.0% | 10 | 59 | ||||
| A•••• I••• other | $41B | +14% | 0.0% | 3 | 25 | ||||
| N••••• O•• N•••• A••••••• I••• asset manager | $41B | +25% | 1.2% | 100% | 1 | 9 | |||
| P•••••••• I••••••••• L•• asset manager | $41B | -10.0% | 12 | $3.4B | 0.6% | 100% | 1 | ||
| M•••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L••• other | $41B | -11% | 14% | 56% | 3 | 17 | |||
| A•••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• other | $41B | -4.0% | 0.0% | 1 | 13 | ||||
| M••••• S•••••• A•• G• L• asset manager | $41B | +5.7% | 23 | $1.8B | 1.1% | 100% | 7 | 107 | |
| A•••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• other | $41B | +1.2% | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| H••••• B•• C•••••• M••••••••• L• asset manager | $41B | +20% | 0.0% | 4 | 11 | ||||
| B•••••• I••••••••• P•••••••• L• other | $41B | +52% | 24 | $1.7B | 8.5% | 53% | 465 | 2 | 18 |
| L•• A•••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $41B | +30% | 1 | $41B | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | ||
| F••••••• T•••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•••••• asset manager | $41B | +31% | 0.1% | 100% | 3 | ||||
| B••••••••• T••••••• O••••••••• A••••••• L••••• asset manager | $40B | -2.2% | 0.0% | 4 | 103 | ||||
| M••••••• F•••••••• R••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $40B | -1.8% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| A•••• A••• L•••••• asset manager | $40B | -7.2% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| C•••••• R••••••• A•• M••••••••• asset manager | $40B | +1.8% | 0.0% | 4 | |||||
| C••••• P••••••• R••••••••• P••• C••••••••• institutional | $40B | +112% | 82 | $491M | 0.0% | 34 | |||
| I•• I•••••••• ••• A••••••• L•• asset manager | $40B | +22% | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | ||||
| B•• P•••••• I••••••••• C•••••• I••• independent RIA | $40B | +12% | 58% | 75% | 33 | ||||
| D• C•••••• P••••••• L••• asset manager | $40B | +45% | 0.0% | 2 | 25 | ||||
| C••••• C•••••• M••••••••• ••• L•• asset manager | $40B | +4.6% | 0.0% | 1 | 20 | ||||
| A•••••••• P••••••• B••• other | $40B | +8.7% | 0.0% | 6 | |||||
| B••••• I••• asset manager | $40B | +8.6% | 0.0% | 2 | |||||
| T••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• institutional | $39B | +5.9% | 21 | $1.9B | 0.0% | 2 | |||
| K•••• A••••••• R•••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• mixed wealth | $39B | -13% | 36 | $1.1B | 20% | 97% | 55 | 23 | |
| C••••••••• I••••••••• P••••••• I••• asset manager | $39B | +17% | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | ||||
| E•• P••••••• I••• asset manager | $39B | +17% | 0.0% | 3 | |||||
| P•••• C•••••• F•••••••• mixed wealth | $39B | +30% | 263 | $149M | 48% | 69% | 84 | 88 | |
| M•••• S••••• A•••••••• L•• asset manager | $39B | +12% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| M••••••••• other | $39B | -8.1% | 0.0% | 1 | 8 | ||||
| A••• A•••••••• I••• asset manager | $39B | +36% | 15 | $2.6B | 0.0% | 2 | |||
| T•• I••••••••• M••••••••• C•••••• L•• asset manager | $39B | -3.3% | 40 | $970M | 6.5% | 4.2% | 119 | 7 | |
| L••••• A••••••• L• asset manager | $39B | +42% | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | ||||
| V••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $39B | +19% | 79 | $491M | 0.0% | 8 | |||
| M• C•••••• P••••••• A•••••• I••• asset manager | $39B | +13% | 0.0% | 5 | 67 | ||||
| W••••••••• R••••••••• A••••••• institutional | $39B | -67% | 146 | $264M | 6.4% | 68% | 42 | 51 | |
| S••••••••• I••••••••• I•••••••• asset manager | $39B | -5.7% | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | ||||
| I••••••••• L•• other | $39B | +10.0% | 1 | $39B | 3.6% | 100% | 1 | 21 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.