DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
3,944 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N.L.C. LLC asset manager | $286M | 1 | $286M | 0.0% | 1 | 15 | |||
| THE HOLLAND GROUP, RETIREMENT WEALTH ADVISORS, LLC independent RIA | $286M | +33% | 3 | $95.4M | 99% | 29% | 248 | 1 | |
| GOLD MEDAL WATERS, INC. independent RIA | $286M | +15% | 3 | $95.2M | 98% | 95% | 46 | 1 | |
| T•• P••••• K••••• C•••••• independent RIA | $285M | -3.5% | 2 | $143M | 100% | 94% | 82 | 1 | |
| A••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $285M | +1.0% | 2 | $143M | 99% | 96% | 56 | 1 | |
| M••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $285M | 2 | $143M | 100% | 85% | 100 | 1 | ||
| P•••••••• F••••• F•••••••• A••••••• I•• independent RIA | $285M | +25% | 3 | $95.0M | 100% | 92% | 125 | 1 | |
| P•••••• C•••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• mixed wealth | $285M | +15% | 1 | $285M | 32% | 100% | 1 | ||
| C•••••• F•••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $285M | +17% | 3 | $94.9M | 96% | 72% | 74 | 1 | |
| K••• C•••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $285M | +29% | 3 | $94.9M | 99% | 85% | 66 | 1 | |
| C••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $285M | +16% | 3 | $94.9M | 93% | 43% | 189 | 1 | |
| L••••••••• R••••••••• independent RIA | $285M | +34% | 1 | $285M | 100% | 58% | 182 | 1 | |
| B••••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $284M | +21% | 3 | $94.8M | 99% | 100% | 1 | ||
| G•••••••• F•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $284M | +1.1% | 1 | $284M | 95% | 92% | 156 | 1 | |
| F••••••• W••• • N•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $284M | +11% | 1 | $284M | 52% | 62% | 358 | 1 | |
| S••••• B•••• • G•••••• I••• D•••• S•• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $284M | +0.3% | 3 | $94.7M | 99% | 61% | 159 | 1 | |
| P•••••••• A•••• M••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $284M | +4.5% | 2 | $142M | 98% | 81% | 93 | 1 | |
| G•••••• F••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $284M | +15% | 1 | $284M | 52% | 96% | 33 | 1 | |
| H•••• • H••••• independent RIA | $284M | +13% | 2 | $142M | 87% | 63% | 131 | 1 | |
| S••••• M••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $283M | +9.7% | 2 | $142M | 96% | 91% | 55 | 1 | |
| S••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $283M | +22% | 3 | $94.4M | 100% | 78% | 96 | 1 | |
| S••••••••• B•••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $283M | +63% | 2 | $142M | 97% | 99% | 66 | 1 | |
| C••••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $282M | +12% | 2 | $141M | 100% | 95% | 89 | 1 | |
| S•••• • A••••••••• P• independent RIA | $282M | +23% | 3 | $94.1M | 98% | 76% | 64 | 1 | |
| P•••••• C•••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $282M | +0.8% | 3 | $94.0M | 99% | 100% | 1 | 1 | |
| F••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $282M | +17% | 3 | $93.9M | 93% | 95% | 43 | 1 | |
| B••••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $282M | +28% | 2 | $141M | 94% | 86% | 69 | 1 | |
| S••••••••• P••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $282M | +16% | 3 | $93.8M | 98% | 40% | 68 | 1 | 3 |
| B••••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $281M | +26% | 3 | $93.8M | 93% | 64% | 125 | 1 | |
| M••••• A••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $281M | +51% | 3 | $93.7M | 100% | 97% | 27 | 1 | |
| S•••• A•••• M••••••••• C••• L•• independent RIA | $281M | +7.6% | 3 | $93.7M | 99% | 30% | 255 | 1 | |
| R•• F•••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $281M | +16% | 2 | $140M | 97% | 87% | 109 | 1 | |
| F••••• F•••••••• I•• independent RIA | $280M | +16% | 1 | $280M | 100% | 90% | 194 | 4 | |
| W•• A••••••• I••• independent RIA | $280M | +22% | 2 | $140M | 72% | 99% | 27 | 1 | |
| W••••• C•••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $280M | 3 | $93.3M | 92% | 71% | 132 | 1 | ||
| C•••••• F•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $280M | +27% | 2 | $140M | 100% | 98% | 25 | 1 | |
| P•••••• W••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $280M | +31% | 3 | $93.3M | 100% | 91% | 34 | 1 | |
| C•••••••• C••••••• I••• independent RIA | $280M | +15% | 2 | $140M | 98% | 82% | 114 | 1 | |
| C•• F•••••••• G•••• asset manager | $279M | -1.4% | 1 | $279M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| A••••••• F•••••••• • T•• S••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $279M | +8.8% | 1 | $279M | 100% | 85% | 185 | 2 | |
| K••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $279M | +622% | 1 | $279M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| S••••••• D••• L•• independent RIA | $279M | 3 | $93.0M | 99% | 82% | 51 | 1 | ||
| C••••••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $279M | -8.9% | 2 | $139M | 72% | 68% | 115 | 1 | 4 |
| H•••••• F••••• W•••••• I••• independent RIA | $279M | -0.3% | 2 | $139M | 100% | 97% | 47 | 1 | |
| W••••• A••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $278M | +29% | 2 | $139M | 100% | 76% | 136 | 1 | |
| F••• H•••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $278M | +16% | 2 | $139M | 93% | 66% | 233 | 1 | |
| C•••••• I••••••••• A••••••• I•• independent RIA | $278M | +18% | 1 | $278M | 100% | 88% | 118 | 1 | |
| I••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $278M | +25% | 2 | $139M | 100% | 100% | 144 | 1 | 1 |
| S••••••• F•••••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $278M | +8.6% | 2 | $139M | 100% | 89% | 75 | 1 | |
| A•••••••• A••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $278M | +33% | 2 | $139M | 93% | 85% | 91 | 1 | |
| A••••••••• F•••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $278M | +1.4% | 1 | $278M | 100% | 86% | 193 | 2 | |
| H••••• I••••• C•••••• L•• independent RIA | $278M | +22% | 1 | $278M | 93% | 100% | 1 | ||
| T••••••• I••••••••• A•••••••• L•• asset manager | $277M | +125% | 1 | $277M | 0.0% | 1 | |||
| T•••• C•••••• M••••••••• I••••••••• C••••••• I••• independent RIA | $277M | +22% | 1 | $277M | 91% | 93% | 59 | 2 | |
| W•••••• P••••••• L•• independent RIA | $277M | +38% | 3 | $92.2M | 100% | 95% | 31 | 1 | |
| J•• F•••••••• S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $277M | +5.6% | 2 | $138M | 100% | 55% | 299 | 1 | |
| S•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $276M | +9.8% | 1 | $276M | 100% | 44% | 301 | 2 | |
| C•• P•••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $276M | +25% | 2 | $138M | 100% | 41% | 256 | 1 | |
| S•••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $276M | +15% | 3 | $92.0M | 99% | 11% | 71 | 1 | |
| C••••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $276M | +6.7% | 1 | $276M | 89% | 80% | 238 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.