DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filed
A practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several. The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XP ADVISORY US, INC. other | $792M | -49% | 30 | $26.4M | 12% | 100% | 2 | ||
| CRESTA ADVISORS mixed wealth | $786M | +47% | 6 | $131M | 42% | 91% | 35 | 1 | |
| AMERANT INVESTMENTS, INC. independent RIA | $782M | +14% | 21 | $37.3M | 52% | 66% | 47 | 8 | |
| D•• C•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $780M | +14% | 6 | $130M | 93% | 97% | 19 | 1 | |
| G••••• V••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $775M | +9.5% | 100 | $7.8M | 99% | 30% | 38 | 6 | |
| P••••••••• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $770M | +25% | 7 | $110M | 65% | 54% | 473 | 4 | |
| H•••••• • W•••• A•••• M••••••••• I••• BD affiliated | $769M | +63% | 71 | $10.8M | 94% | 46% | 15 | 2 | |
| A•• W••••• A••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $768M | +12% | 5 | $154M | 99% | 81% | 239 | 3 | |
| J•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $763M | +8.6% | 6 | $127M | 96% | 91% | 163 | 2 | |
| S•• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $760M | +18% | 9 | $84.5M | 93% | 81% | 130 | 3 | |
| H••••• F•••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $760M | +23% | 9 | $84.4M | 100% | 76% | 93 | 1 | |
| H•••••• I••••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $758M | +42% | 28 | $27.1M | 81% | 60% | 54 | 13 | |
| K•••• F•••••••• A•••• A•••••••• L••• independent RIA | $758M | +20% | 14 | $54.1M | 100% | 52% | 73 | 2 | |
| I•••••••• F•••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $757M | 10 | $75.7M | 99% | 18% | 61 | 1 | ||
| T•••• C•••••• W••••• M••••••••• I•• independent RIA | $755M | +24% | 22 | $34.3M | 100% | 69% | 47 | 12 | |
| S•••••• • M•••••• L•• independent RIA | $753M | +20% | 3 | $251M | 84% | 57% | 209 | 1 | |
| E••• L•• independent RIA | $751M | +34% | 9 | $83.4M | 100% | 13% | 44 | 1 | |
| P•• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $747M | +2.6% | 16 | $46.7M | 100% | 53% | 84 | 3 | |
| T•••••• H•••••• L•• independent RIA | $746M | +22% | 3 | $249M | 86% | 99% | 19 | 4 | |
| B••• H•••••• E•••••• I••• independent RIA | $746M | 21 | $35.5M | 99% | 30% | 70 | 8 | ||
| A••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $742M | +28% | 3 | $247M | 67% | 44% | 615 | 1 | |
| G••••••• C•••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $742M | +16% | 5 | $148M | 97% | 91% | 92 | 1 | |
| A•••••••• I••••••••• independent RIA | $742M | +17% | 14 | $53.0M | 87% | 57% | 97 | 11 | |
| N••••••• W••••• M••••••••• mixed wealth | $740M | +79% | 9 | $82.2M | 40% | 29% | 117 | 2 | |
| B•••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• mixed wealth | $737M | +19% | 36% | 77% | 1 | 10 | |||
| A•••• C•••••• M••••••••• G•••• L•• other | $734M | +20% | 3 | $245M | 11% | 83% | 28 | 2 | |
| G••••• P•••••• S•••••••• L•• institutional | $734M | +16% | 7 | $105M | 0.0% | 3 | |||
| C• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $734M | +17% | 42 | $17.5M | 100% | 33% | 52 | 42 | |
| W••••• L••• P••••••• • W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $732M | +9.4% | 5 | $146M | 100% | 45% | 73 | 1 | |
| L•••• S••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $729M | +22% | 13 | $56.0M | 97% | 53% | 90 | 1 | |
| W••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $724M | -8.6% | 9 | $80.4M | 100% | 65% | 50 | 3 | |
| J••• E••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $722M | -21% | 3 | $241M | 88% | 94% | 59 | 1 | |
| M••••••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $721M | +16% | 4 | $180M | 99% | 70% | 205 | 3 | |
| G• A• R••••• • C•••••• BD affiliated | $716M | +17% | 37 | $19.4M | 96% | 0.0% | 85 | 21 | |
| R•• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $716M | +11% | 12 | $59.7M | 94% | 78% | 104 | 1 | |
| V•••••••• B••••• F•••••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $712M | +18% | 7 | $102M | 100% | 53% | 284 | 1 | |
| P•••••••• W••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $711M | +84% | 8 | $88.9M | 81% | 96% | 55 | 5 | |
| T•• W••••• G•••• • A••••• B• C•••• • A••••••••• independent RIA | $711M | +25% | 12 | $59.3M | 100% | 77% | 49 | 2 | |
| P••• P••••••• G••••• L•• independent RIA | $710M | +9.1% | 8 | $88.7M | 100% | 71% | 105 | 5 | |
| R•••• • A••••••••• independent RIA | $710M | +7.1% | 8 | $88.7M | 100% | 67% | 185 | 3 | |
| A•• A••••••• L•• other | $708M | +61% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| M••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $707M | +16% | 10 | $70.7M | 95% | 1 | |||
| D•••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $706M | +11% | 7 | $101M | 97% | 15% | 60 | 2 | |
| N•••••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $706M | +15% | 4 | $177M | 95% | 79% | 143 | 2 | |
| S••••••• C••••• • E•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $706M | +13% | 6 | $118M | 89% | 70% | 92 | 1 | |
| B••••••• F• E•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $705M | -21% | 6 | $118M | 97% | 18% | 183 | 5 | |
| S••••••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $704M | +12% | 8 | $88.0M | 100% | 98% | 27 | 1 | |
| K•• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $700M | 4 | $175M | 100% | 95% | 46 | 1 | ||
| H••••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $698M | +26% | 3 | $233M | 99% | 92% | 149 | 1 | |
| W•• F•••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $694M | +13% | 15 | $46.3M | 65% | 80% | 106 | 1 | |
| W••••• M••••••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $686M | +22% | 5 | $137M | 75% | 87% | 140 | 2 | |
| M• P•••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $686M | +17% | 5 | $137M | 100% | 74% | 73 | 2 | |
| C•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $683M | +12% | 6 | $114M | 96% | 88% | 61 | 3 | |
| S•••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $681M | +48% | 19 | $35.9M | 97% | 69% | 130 | 5 | |
| H••••• V•••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $678M | +28% | 4 | $170M | 98% | 97% | 51 | 4 | 1 |
| R••••••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $676M | +19% | 8 | $84.6M | 99% | 57% | 202 | 4 | |
| W••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L••••• independent RIA | $676M | +22% | 5 | $135M | 100% | 95% | 28 | 1 | |
| S••••• W••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $676M | +7.3% | 12 | $56.3M | 97% | 68% | 64 | 7 | |
| A•••••••• W••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $675M | +30% | 5 | $135M | 96% | 70% | 114 | 2 | |
| G••••• S•••• I••••••••• A••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $674M | +20% | 33 | $20.4M | 97% | 48% | 76 | 5 |
1,073 practices match (Wrap program sponsor). Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.