DFX Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filedAbout practice archetypesA practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several.The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
4,728 practices match
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEANE RETIREMENT STRATEGIES, INC. independent RIA | $251M | +16% | 3 | $83.6M | 99% | 90% | 46 | 1 | |
| AMARA FINANCIAL, LLC independent RIA | $250M | +25% | 3 | $83.5M | 99% | 86% | 48 | 2 | |
| LIG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC independent RIA | $250M | +47% | 4 | $62.6M | 84% | 59% | 102 | 1 | |
| F••••• • W•••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $250M | +8.1% | 1 | $250M | 99% | 74% | 300 | 1 | |
| M•••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $250M | +43% | 2 | $125M | 100% | 80% | 87 | 1 | |
| C••••• P•••••• W••••• independent RIA | $250M | +77% | 5 | $50.1M | 76% | 88% | 17 | 2 | |
| T••••••••• C••••••• L•• independent RIA | $250M | 4 | $62.5M | 89% | 75% | 45 | 1 | 2 | |
| E•••••• F•••••••• G•••• independent RIA | $250M | +11% | 4 | $62.5M | 100% | 78% | 52 | 1 | |
| A••••• W••••• A••••••• I••• independent RIA | $250M | +48% | 4 | $62.5M | 100% | 64% | 112 | 1 | |
| D••• W••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $250M | +19% | 2 | $125M | 100% | 80% | 96 | 1 | |
| O••••••• F•••••••• independent RIA | $250M | +48% | 8 | $31.2M | 100% | 57% | 118 | 2 | |
| B••••••••• • A••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $250M | +13% | 4 | $62.4M | 98% | 77% | 67 | 1 | |
| V••••••• W••••• independent RIA | $250M | 14 | $17.8M | 100% | 50% | 34 | 6 | ||
| S••••• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $250M | +10% | 4 | $62.4M | 99% | 81% | 95 | 1 | |
| C••••••••• F•••••••• G•••• W• L• independent RIA | $249M | +15% | 6 | $41.6M | 93% | 63% | 216 | 3 | |
| P•••••• R••••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $249M | +15% | 3 | $83.1M | 78% | 53% | 93 | 1 | |
| E• B••••• • C••• I••• independent RIA | $249M | +4.3% | 1 | $249M | 99% | 89% | 1 | ||
| G••••• C•••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $249M | -0.4% | 4 | $62.3M | 84% | 86% | 38 | 1 | |
| E••••••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $249M | +23% | 4 | $62.3M | 100% | 58% | 93 | 2 | |
| M•••••• B•••• • C••• L•• independent RIA | $249M | +8.9% | 2 | $124M | 100% | 75% | 109 | 1 | |
| T•••••• F••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $248M | +23% | 6 | $41.4M | 73% | 79% | 37 | 3 | |
| T•• C••••••• G•••• L•• independent RIA | $248M | +22% | 2 | $124M | 100% | 68% | 131 | 1 | |
| L•••••• • A••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $248M | 3 | $82.7M | 90% | 54% | 157 | 1 | ||
| M•••••• L••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $248M | +2.5% | 2 | $124M | 97% | 82% | 70 | 1 | |
| C•••• P•••• C•••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $248M | +24% | 6 | $41.4M | 97% | 69% | 49 | 1 | |
| F•••• W••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $248M | -9.6% | 1 | $248M | 95% | 81% | 115 | 1 | |
| N••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $248M | +30% | 7 | $35.4M | 100% | 78% | 38 | 3 | |
| W••••• I••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $247M | +1.5% | 3 | $82.5M | 99% | 79% | 76 | 2 | |
| K••••••• F•••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $247M | +24% | 7 | $35.3M | 95% | 82% | 40 | 1 | |
| B••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $247M | +17% | 4 | $61.8M | 76% | 85% | 37 | 3 | |
| A••••• B•• C••••••• I••• independent RIA | $247M | +13% | 6 | $41.2M | 98% | 81% | 31 | 2 | |
| A•• F•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $247M | +27% | 3 | $82.4M | 100% | 70% | 152 | 2 | |
| T•••• W••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $247M | 3 | $82.3M | 88% | 54% | 126 | 1 | ||
| V•••• I••••••••• P••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $247M | +74% | 4 | $61.7M | 99% | 89% | 39 | 5 | |
| 1• C•••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $246M | +16% | 4 | $61.6M | 96% | 88% | 32 | 1 | |
| N•••• independent RIA | $246M | +8.5% | 3 | $82.0M | 100% | 84% | 65 | 1 | |
| T•• P••••••••• F•••••••• C•••••• L•• independent RIA | $246M | -32% | 3 | $82.0M | 84% | 81% | 85 | 1 | |
| R••••••••• P••••••• S••••••• independent RIA | $246M | +25% | 2 | $123M | 91% | 79% | 124 | 1 | |
| G••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $246M | +6.3% | 3 | $81.9M | 73% | 89% | 20 | 1 | |
| W•••••••• F•••••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $246M | +17% | 2 | $123M | 100% | 83% | 83 | 1 | |
| R• F•••••••• S•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $245M | +11% | 3 | $81.8M | 95% | 70% | 130 | 2 | |
| I••••••• P•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $245M | +5.6% | 4 | $61.2M | 100% | 82% | 47 | 3 | |
| 9•• G•••• independent RIA | $245M | +31% | 3 | $81.6M | 98% | 88% | 68 | 1 | |
| B•••• • A••••••••• W••••• C••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $245M | +26% | 8 | $30.6M | 96% | 80% | 33 | 2 | |
| B•••• P•••••• W•••••• L•• independent RIA | $244M | +13% | 4 | $61.0M | 95% | 85% | 53 | 3 | |
| R••••••••• W••••• •••• L•••••• independent RIA | $244M | +12% | 11 | $22.2M | 86% | 71% | 24 | 17 | |
| A••• F•••••••• C••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $244M | +26% | 4 | $61.0M | 100% | 68% | 72 | 3 | |
| I••••• W••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $244M | +3.3% | 2 | $122M | 91% | 67% | 70 | 1 | |
| L••••• S••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $244M | +26% | 3 | $81.3M | 100% | 74% | 83 | 3 | |
| A••••••• W••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $244M | 3 | $81.3M | 100% | 70% | 62 | 1 | ||
| P••••••• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $244M | +15% | 4 | $60.9M | 100% | 79% | 51 | 1 | |
| E••• W••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $243M | 2 | $122M | 82% | 76% | 85 | 4 | ||
| R•••••• W••••• M••••••••• I••• independent RIA | $243M | +21% | 3 | $81.1M | 100% | 70% | 121 | 1 | |
| C••••••• W••••• M••••••••• G••••• I••• independent RIA | $243M | 5 | $48.6M | 100% | 81% | 51 | 2 | ||
| R••••••••• T•• A•• W••••• A•••••••• I••• independent RIA | $243M | +43% | 8 | $30.4M | 97% | 72% | 33 | 2 | |
| Z••••• W••••• M••••••••• independent RIA | $243M | -42% | 3 | $80.9M | 75% | 60% | 73 | 2 | |
| B••• S•••• C•••••• A••••••• independent RIA | $243M | +10% | 2 | $121M | 99% | 87% | 43 | 2 | |
| B•••••• W•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $243M | +38% | 2 | $121M | 77% | 75% | 123 | 2 | |
| C••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $243M | -4.4% | 2 | $121M | 94% | 68% | 448 | 2 | |
| C••••• I••••••••• A••••••• L•• independent RIA | $243M | +17% | 3 | $80.9M | 62% | 82% | 38 | 1 |
Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.