DFX Intelligence
RIA Intelligence
Practices
What each practice looks like, from what it filed
A practice archetype is a rule over Form ADV answers (client mix, assets, advisors, offices, affiliations, activities, Schedule A owners), printed on every firm page beside the label; a firm can carry several. The operating metrics are derived from reported fields with the formula shown on the firm page. Nothing here estimates an advisor’s book or a firm’s revenue.
| Firm | RAUM | 1y | Advisors | Per advisor | Private clients | HNW of private | Clients / advisor | Offices | Funds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERITY PARTNERS OCIO LLC institutional | $21B | +22% | 2 | $11B | 0.0% | 100% | 3 | 1 | |
| IQ EQ FUND MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PRIVATE LIMITED asset manager | $21B | +38% | 0.8% | 100% | 1 | 27 | |||
| CHARLESBANK CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC asset manager | $21B | +6.3% | 0.0% | 2 | 50 | ||||
| A•••••••• C••••••• H•••••••• L•• other | $21B | +0.8% | 2.6% | 93% | 3 | 38 | |||
| A••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L• asset manager | $21B | +55% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| H••••••• A••••••••• I•• other | $21B | +4.2% | 2 | $10B | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | ||
| B••• • G••••• L•• mixed wealth | $21B | +4.5% | 25 | $840M | 33% | 100% | 2 | ||
| R••••• C•••••• asset manager | $21B | +43% | 0.0% | 2 | 67 | ||||
| B•••• S••••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $21B | +17% | 87% | 100% | 1 | ||||
| T••••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• I••• BD affiliated | $21B | +19% | 3,164 | $6.6M | 98% | 56% | 39 | 1,227 | |
| E•••••••• M••••••••• G••••• L••••• asset manager | $21B | +69% | 0.0% | 3 | 29 | ||||
| M•••••• D••••••• P••••••• asset manager | $21B | +29% | 0.0% | 1 | 57 | ||||
| C•••••• C••••••• L• asset manager | $21B | +5.8% | 0.0% | 12 | 1 | ||||
| O•••••• A••••••• L•• asset manager | $21B | +19% | 0.0% | 7 | 24 | ||||
| O•••• C•••••• independent RIA | $21B | +1.0% | 1 | $21B | 66% | 100% | 2 | 123 | |
| A•••••••• L• asset manager | $20B | +15% | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | ||||
| F•••••••• C••••••••• I••• institutional | $20B | +20% | 0.0% | 4 | |||||
| V••••••• A•••• M••••••••• I••• other | $20B | -24% | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | ||||
| H•••••• P•••••••• L• asset manager | $20B | +2.2% | 0.0% | 3 | 39 | ||||
| B••••••• V•••••• P••••••• asset manager | $20B | +7.7% | 0.0% | 11 | 37 | ||||
| R•••• C•••••• M••••••••• ••• L• asset manager | $20B | -3.3% | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | ||||
| H••••••• S••••• A•••••••• L•• asset manager | $20B | +1.1% | 0.0% | 11 | 3 | ||||
| H•••••• C•••••• M••••••••• asset manager | $20B | +17% | 0.0% | 2 | 74 | ||||
| M••••• F•••••••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $20B | +16% | 0.1% | 100% | 6 | ||||
| R•••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• I••• other | $20B | +7.6% | 4 | $5.0B | 0.0% | 2 | |||
| M••••• O• A•••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $20B | +5.0% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| A•••• P•••••• E••••• asset manager | $20B | +2.9% | 0.0% | 5 | 38 | ||||
| P•••• L•• asset manager | $20B | +23% | 0.0% | 6 | |||||
| W•••••• A•••• M••••••••• C•••••• L•••••• institutional | $20B | -40% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| B••••••••• A••••••••• S•••••••• L••••• asset manager | $20B | +11% | 0.0% | 7 | 39 | ||||
| B••• A••••••• L••••• asset manager | $20B | +1.0% | 0.0% | 7 | |||||
| S••••• T•••• A•••••••• L•• independent RIA | $20B | -16% | 29 | $688M | 83% | 99% | 22 | 17 | |
| N•• E••• W••••• BD affiliated | $20B | +65% | 148 | $135M | 95% | 94% | 24 | 19 | |
| R•• W••••• P••••••• independent RIA | $20B | +15% | 73 | $271M | 93% | 94% | 82 | 6 | |
| O••••••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• independent RIA | $20B | +58% | 58 | $341M | 81% | 100% | 185 | 1 | |
| R••••• C••••••• M••••••••• I•• institutional | $20B | -9.9% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| T••••••• H••••••• L•• institutional | $20B | 1 | $20B | 0.0% | 5 | 37 | |||
| R•••••• P••••• S••••••••• L•• asset manager | $20B | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | |||||
| A••• C•••••• M••••••••• I• L•• asset manager | $20B | +119% | 2 | $9.8B | 0.0% | 23 | |||
| P••• A••••• S••••••••• L•• BD affiliated | $20B | +31% | 1,908 | $10.3M | 95% | 51% | 42 | 544 | |
| T••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• asset manager | $20B | +18% | 0.0% | 1 | 45 | ||||
| E•••••• C•••••• •••• L• asset manager | $20B | +25% | 0.0% | 2 | |||||
| E•••••••• F•••••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $19B | +19% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| P•••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L• asset manager | $19B | +106% | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | ||||
| B•••••••• P••••••• A•••••••• L•• asset manager | $19B | +24% | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | ||||
| A•••• A•••• M••••••••• U• L•••••• asset manager | $19B | +4.1% | 0.0% | 2 | |||||
| P•• P•••••••• L•• asset manager | $19B | +37% | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | ||||
| C•••••• L•• independent RIA | $19B | +5.0% | 147 | $130M | 93% | 94% | 46 | 34 | |
| V•••••• A•••• M••••••••• L•• institutional | $19B | -14% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| E•••••• C•••••• ••• L•• asset manager | $19B | +4.1% | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | ||||
| B••••••• A•••• M••••••••• L••• independent RIA | $19B | -3.5% | 1 | $19B | 53% | 95% | 3,006 | 3 | 5 |
| A•••••• I••••••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $19B | +5.2% | 0.0% | 1 | |||||
| D•••••••• M••••••••• C•••••• asset manager | $19B | +19% | 0.0% | 2 | 12 | ||||
| K•• C•••••• P•••••••• L• asset manager | $19B | -3.4% | 0.0% | 8 | 15 | ||||
| G•••• H••• P••••••• asset manager | $19B | +63% | 0.0% | 2 | 50 | ||||
| K••••••••• C•••••• M••••••••• L•• asset manager | $19B | +20% | 0.0% | 3 | 12 | ||||
| B••••••• F• E•••••• • C••••••• I••••••••• BD affiliated | $19B | +21% | 514 | $36.8M | 95% | 14% | 63 | 101 | |
| A••••• I•••••••• asset manager | $19B | +5.0% | 0.0% | 3 | 16 | ||||
| A••••••• S••••••••• L•• asset manager | $19B | -7.0% | 0.0% | 2 | 22 | ||||
| P••• S••••• C•••••• U•• L• asset manager | $19B | 0.0% | 2 | 36 |
17,149 practices match. Derived columns: RAUM over IAPD advisors, individual and HNW RAUM over total, HNW RAUM over private-client RAUM, private clients over advisors, Item 1.F.5 offices plus one.
The firm and advisor names past the first 3 rows are hidden. Open a row to reveal that record with a free account (5 a month), or get RIA and Wealth Intelligence at $249 a month for every name. Every figure, date and source is public either way.